Hello Chris,
> > In LedgerSMB, we take this a step further by making the procedures
> > into discoverable interfaces,
how do you do that ?
Karsten
--
NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie!
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
--
Sent
is there anything special you have configured on master and slave?
could I see the related configuration on your master and slave? such
as wal_keep_segments,checkpoint_segments or any other might be
related? thanks a lot!
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Scott Ribe
wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2011, at
On 23 Jul 2011, at 16:49, Pablo Romero Abiti wrote:
> Hi Alban, thank's for your reply. I already changed it as you wrote, but I'm
> still having the problem that the trigger won't execute unless the value
> specified for idcolor in table warehouse does exist. Shouldn't the trigger
> execute BE
On 24 Jul 2011, at 11:00, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> You can't fire a trigger on non-existant data.
I just realised the above statement is a little inexact: you can't fire
row-level triggers on non-existant data.
You can still fire statement-level triggers on them, but with those you won't
have
On 07/22/2011 11:02 PM, Pablo Romero Abiti wrote:
Here's what I want to do:
I have a master table that has 2 columns: idcol1 and idcol2, where
idcol2 is equivalent to idcol1
Table: color_eq
idcol1 idcol2
1 1
2 2
2 3
Table: warehouse
idcolqty
110
220
if I exe
On 24/07/11 17:51, Chris Travers wrote:
I was thinking similar thoughts, but you not only beat me to it, you made
some good points I had not thought of!
The only thing I can think of adding: is that it would be good to lock down
the database so that only the middleware can access it, everything
On 24 Červenec 2011, 6:09, Yan Chunlu wrote:
> thanks for all the help!
>
> @Adrian: yes, only one instance on each machine
>
> not the slave finally started and could be connect, replication didn't
> begin, just following errors:
> https://gist.github.com/1102225
These errors just mean the maste
checkpoint_segments = 64
wal_keep_segments = 128
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 24 Červenec 2011, 6:09, Yan Chunlu wrote:
>> thanks for all the help!
>>
>> @Adrian: yes, only one instance on each machine
>>
>> not the slave finally started and could be connect, replica
Hi
I am working on pgpool /postgresql/linux first time. All these three are
new to me.
I am running pgpool-HA using pacemaker-corosync.
I am having following error in my setup. Does any body have any idea
about the warning highlighted in logs ? Any type of help would be
appreciated a lot...
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Karsten Hilbert
wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
>> > In LedgerSMB, we take this a step further by making the procedures
>> > into discoverable interfaces,
>
> how do you do that ?
The way we do things in 1.3 beta is relatively free-form and not idea.
In future versions
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Sim Zacks wrote:
> I gave a talk on using postgresql as an application server at PG East in
> March.
>
> Basically, we try to implement all business logic using functions, using
> plpythonu when necessary.
>
> For example, we have functions that send email, ftp f
I did the SR procedure again, still no luck:
is that normal that after start slave postgresql, the first line of log is:
database system was interrupted; last known up at 2011-07-24 10:53:38 CDT??
4760 2011-07-24 10:55:58 CDT 2011-07-24 10:55:58 CDT @ LOG: database
system was interrupted; last
On Saturday, July 23, 2011 3:34:07 pm MirrorX wrote:
> i mentioned the sequences number only b/c it seemed stange and i didnt know
> if it could be related to the "weird" sizes.
>
> now i found something more weird...the autovacuum is ON but on
> pg_stat_user_tables on this specific table tha last
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On Saturday, July 23, 2011 3:34:07 pm MirrorX wrote:
>> i mentioned the sequences number only b/c it seemed stange and i didnt know
>> if it could be related to the "weird" sizes.
>>
>> now i found something more weird...the autovacuum is ON
Dne 24.7.2011 14:46, Yan Chunlu napsal(a):
> checkpoint_segments = 64
> wal_keep_segments = 128
This information alone is not sufficient - we don't know how much write
activity is on the primary system, so we can't say if those number are
sufficient or not. You have to tune them according to write
Hi everybody:
I searched the web trying to find an answer to this, but found none. I have
a postgresql server and a database, and I granted access to some users.
However I want them to access the data only through some specific client
application. I do not want them to have access through psql or s
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 14:36, Mario Puntin wrote:
>
> Hi everybody:
> I searched the web trying to find an answer to this, but found none. I have
> a postgresql server and a database, and I granted access to some users.
> However I want them to access the data only through some specific client
>
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 14:36, Mario Puntin wrote:
>>
>> Hi everybody:
>> I searched the web trying to find an answer to this, but found none. I have
>> a postgresql server and a database, and I granted access to some users.
>> However I want th
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Mario Puntin wrote:
>
> Hi everybody:
> I searched the web trying to find an answer to this, but found none. I have
> a postgresql server and a database, and I granted access to some users.
> However I want them to access the data only through some specific client
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Mario Puntin wrote:
>
> Hi everybody:
> I searched the web trying to find an answer to this, but found none. I have
> a postgresql server and a database, and I granted access to some users.
> However I want them to access the data only through some specific client
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 14:48, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 14:36, Mario Puntin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everybody:
>>> I searched the web trying to find an answer to this, but found none. I have
>>> a postgresql server and a dat
Hello,
I do not know if your clients are superusers on their machines, one thing you
can do is to remove psql client from these machines. In general, for example in
a company, the users do not have administration privileges.
Regards
From: Kurt Buff
To: Lon
On 25/07/2011 5:36 AM, Mario Puntin wrote:
Hi everybody:
I searched the web trying to find an answer to this, but found none. I
have a postgresql server and a database, and I granted access to some
users.
However I want them to access the data only through some specific
client application. I
On 07/24/11 2:36 PM, Mario Puntin wrote:
Hi everybody:
I searched the web trying to find an answer to this, but found none. I
have a postgresql server and a database, and I granted access to some
users.
However I want them to access the data only through some specific
client application. I do
checkpoint_segments = 64
wal_keep_segments = 128
this setting seems is for 5GB capacity, I think there is noway I would
ever write 5GB data during the rsync progress.
I think the problem is still "invalid record length" and "invalid
magic number", it start showing right after I complete sync dat
Thank you for our help anyway!
De : Alban Hertroys
À : Alban Hertroys
Cc : Pablo Romero Abiti ; "pgsql-general@postgresql.org"
Envoyé le : Dimanche 24 Juillet 2011 4h06
Objet : Re: Re : [GENERAL] Update columns in same table from update trigger?
On 24 Jul 2
Dear all,
I am using Postgres-8.4.2 on Windows system.
I have 2 databases in my postgres database ( globedatabase (21GB),
urldatabase).
I restore globedatabase from a .sql file on yesterday morning.I insert
some new data in that database.
In the evening, by mistake I issued a *drop database
* Adarsh Sharma wrote:
In the evening, by mistake I issued a *drop database globedatabase* command.
Is it possible to get the data back till the state before drop database
command.
My pglog files is in the E:/data directory & Binary log is also enabled.
You do not mention that you have a f
On 07/24/2011 06:58 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Sim Zacks wrote:
I gave a talk on using postgresql as an application server at PG East in
March.
Basically, we try to implement all business logic using functions, using
plpythonu when necessary.
For example, we
29 matches
Mail list logo
