Hi Jaime
2011/5/30 Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Stefan Keller wrote:
>>
2. There's an autovacuum background process which already does the
job, doesn't it?
>>>
>>> Yes, but in its own time. If you know there has been a batch of
>>> inserts/deletes you might
Hi,
I see the following error as found in pg.log:
UTC4115FATAL: the database system is in recovery mode
Actually that message was logged repeatedly for about 4 hours according to the
logs (I don't have access to the system itself, just the logs).
Leading up to that error were the following in
Thanks Toby, I will check it, and change it.
regards,
Carl
2011/5/30 Toby Corkindale
> On 28/05/11 18:42, Carl von Clausewitz wrote:
>
>> a few months ago, when I installed my first PostgreSQL, I have had the
>> same problem. I've try to get any information about optimal memory
>> config, and w
http://turedure.oboroduki.com/find11.html
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Hi,
Cube code provided by postgres contrib folder. It uses the NDBOX structure.
On creating index, it's size increase at a high rate.
On inserting some tuple and creating indexes its behaviour is shown below.
1. When there is only one tuple
select pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_
size('cubtest'))
Hello Bosco,
Thank you for your comment. Yes, it would be nice to get some more comments
on the allocate/deallocate on a connection issue.
I have verified that in my case deallocating a prepared statement, it
guesses the wrong connection and returns an error. (The right one is doing
a
David, Thanks for your reply.
I will probably use the strategy of a trigger driven counter, with temporal
strategy devising current month totals and up to last month total as current
month changes rapidly.
I also apologize for not being investigative enough. I did look at wiki but
maybe I did no
The patch seemed to work for me too.
Thanks.
Regards, Per-Olov Esgård
From: Tom Lane
To: Per-Olov Esgard
Cc: Merlin Moncure , pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 05/27/2011 06:19 PM
Subject:Re: [GENERAL] Is there any problem with pg_notify and
memory consumption?
I w
PS.: That goes for the AT clause on the GET DESCRIPTOR statement too. The
connection name is not included in the ECPGget_desc() call.
- "Leif Jensen" wrote:
> Hello Bosco,
>
>Thank you for your comment. Yes, it would be nice to get some more
> comments on the allocate/deallocate on a
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 2:32 PM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Inspecting a DB - psql or system tables ?
>
> On Fri,
Hi,
I am trying to generate self-signed certificate for full ssl authentication. I
need to have universal version of this certificate for development purposes (so
any client can connect with any postgresql server with ssl on).
I am using IP while connecting, I mean host=.
However verify-full co
Nothing changes there. When OpenFire, Courier-MTA and Apache are restarted,
a few numbers change, but othrewise they remain unchanged pretty long. There
is no obvious activity that could trigger a disk write 20 times a minute...
How many databases are in your pg cluster?
There are currently 19
On 29 May 2011, at 23:55, Stefan Keller wrote:
> Hi Alban
>
> On 2011/5/29 Alban Hertroys wrote:
>> On 29 May 2011, at 19:45, Stefan Keller wrote:
>>
>>> But I'm hesitating to use ANALYZE for two reasons:
>>> 1. It's very slow: it repeadly takes 59000 ms on my machine.
>>
>> ANALYZE on a single
PostgreSQL 9.0.4
The following script fails even though the "pkonlytest" table is empty since
we just created it.
>> BEGIN SCRIPT
CREATE TABLE pkonlytest (
pkid text PRIMARY KEY
);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION createpkrecord(INOUT pkvalue text, OUT col
2011/5/30 Toby Corkindale :
> On 28/05/11 18:42, Carl von Clausewitz wrote:
>>
>> a few months ago, when I installed my first PostgreSQL, I have had the
>> same problem. I've try to get any information about optimal memory
>> config, and working, but there wasn't any "optimal memory setting
>> calc
Hi,
I need a little help with a deadlock.
when I execute this (end of the mail) function in parallel sometimes a deadlock
happens.
This function does implement a insert or update functionality.
The error is:
"DETAIL: Process 29464 waits for ShareLock on transaction 1293098; blocked by
proces
Sorry for off topic posting but...
Since pgfoundry has been down, the schedule for releasing pgpool-II
3.0.4, to be released today, will be delayed. Sorry for
inconvenience. We will start to continue the releasing work as soon as
pgfoundry comes back.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: h
Hi Everyone
Some of our databases have been experiencing a sudden spike in
deadlocks being detected.
as far as our knowledge is concerned, there have not been any new
code taken live and no changes from what are aware off.
The databases are running postgresql 8.1
From the log
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Andrej Podzimek wrote:
> Nothing changes there. When OpenFire, Courier-MTA and Apache are restarted,
> a few numbers change, but othrewise they remain unchanged pretty long. There
> is no obvious activity that could trigger a disk write 20 times a minute...
How
Hello
>>[...]
>>Clause USING doesn't do a array unpacking
>>
>>you should to generate little bit different dynamic statement
>>EXECUTE 'SELECT .. WHERE a = $1[1] AND b = $1[2]' USING ARRAY[...]
>
> I changed that but this wasn't my only problem; typecasting was the
> second issue. Column "id1" is
On 05/30/2011 03:45 PM, Machiel Richards wrote:
I am however not sure how to trace these back to a database, table, and
maybe even a query to determine where things are going wrong.
One of the deadlocking queries is shown in the deadlock error message,
but one isn't really enough.
IIRC, new
On 05/30/2011 03:58 PM, Asia wrote:
Would you please advise what I am doing wrong? Or maybe there is other way to
generate wildcard certificate ?
I wouldn't be surprised if libpq didn't support wildcard certificates at
all. I doubt there's ever been any demand for them.
Have you checked in
On 05/30/2011 08:53 PM, Nick Raj wrote:
Hi,
Cube code provided by postgres contrib folder. It uses the NDBOX structure.
On creating index, it's size increase at a high rate.
[snip]
Can some one tell me why index is becoming so large?
How to compress or reduce its size?
It'd help if you inc
On 05/30/2011 10:04 PM, Sebastian Böhm wrote:
Acquired by CREATE INDEX (without CONCURRENTLY).
so where the "ShareLock" is acquired? I don't create an index here.
There's some confusing historical terminology involved here, I'm afraid.
The documentation you referred to talks about table-
On Mon, 30 May 2011 11:02:34 +0200
Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2) I took from your blog entry
>> (http://okbob.blogspot.com/2008/06/execute-using-feature-in-postgresql-84.html)
>> that it is good practice to use EXECUTE USING.
>> Well, there's no danger of SQL injection as this particular DB runs
>>
On 05/30/2011 10:29 PM, Mathew Samuel wrote:
2011-03-28 10:44:28 UTC3609HINT: Consider increasing the configuration
parameter "checkpoint_segments".
2011-03-28 10:44:38 UTC3609LOG: checkpoints are occurring too frequently
(10 seconds apart)
2011-03-28 10:44:38 UTC3609HINT: Consider increasing th
PostgreSQL 9.1beta1, compiled by Visual C++ build 1500, 64-bit (EnterpriseDB
Install Executable)
CREATE DATABASE betatest
TEMPLATE template0
ENCODING 'UTF8'
LC_COLLATE 'C'
LC_CTYPE 'C';
[connect to databas
Hello,
I have a view which is a result of the cross product of three tables, I want to
test how much time is required to populate this view. Also, I want to test the
scalability of this view in the future. Since, I have already live data I am
wondering if I can do that without creating an autom
Craig Ringer writes:
> On 05/30/2011 10:29 PM, Mathew Samuel wrote:
>> 2011-03-28 10:44:42 UTC3932ERROR: canceling statement due to statement
>> timeout
>> 2011-03-28 10:44:42 UTC3932STATEMENT: vacuum full analyze _zamboni.sl_log_1
>> 2011-03-28 10:44:42 UTC3932PANIC: cannot abort transaction 1827
"David Johnston" writes:
> PostgreSQL 9.1beta1, compiled by Visual C++ build 1500, 64-bit (EnterpriseDB
> Install Executable)
> CREATE DATABASE betatest
> TEMPLATE template0
> ENCODING 'UTF8'
> LC_COLLATE 'C'
> LC_CTYPE 'C';
> CR
"David Johnston" writes:
> SELECT ( createpkrecord('1')).*;
> [ results in function being called more than once ]
Yeah. Don't do that. Better style is
SELECT * FROM createpkrecord('1');
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@pos
On 30/05/11 20:41, Cédric Villemain wrote:
2011/5/30 Toby Corkindale:
On 28/05/11 18:42, Carl von Clausewitz wrote:
a few months ago, when I installed my first PostgreSQL, I have had the
same problem. I've try to get any information about optimal memory
config, and working, but there wasn't an
Craig Ringer writes:
> On 05/30/2011 08:53 PM, Nick Raj wrote:
>> Cube code provided by postgres contrib folder. It uses the NDBOX structure.
>> On creating index, it's size increase at a high rate.
> [snip]
>> Can some one tell me why index is becoming so large?
>> How to compress or reduce its
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer writes:
> > On 05/30/2011 08:53 PM, Nick Raj wrote:
> >> Cube code provided by postgres contrib folder. It uses the NDBOX
> structure.
> >> On creating index, it's size increase at a high rate.
>
> > [snip]
>
> >> Can some one tell
2011/5/31 Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz :
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 11:02:34 +0200
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>>> 2) I took from your blog entry
>>> (http://okbob.blogspot.com/2008/06/execute-using-feature-in-postgresql-84.html)
>>> that it is good practice to use EXECUTE USING.
>>> Well, there's no danger
On 30/05/11 20:53, Nick Raj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cube code provided by postgres contrib folder. It uses the NDBOX structure.
> On creating index, it's size increase at a high rate.
Here's what I get on 8.4 with a cleaned up test case. It uses the
original poster's data ( output_vehicle.sql ) and just
36 matches
Mail list logo