What is pg_toast_temp_* in my DB?
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:53:30 +0600
Subject: [GENERAL] What is pg_toast_temp_* in my DB?
From: rumman...@gmail.com
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
What is pg_toast_temp_* in my DB?
Hello!
pg_toast_temp_* are some special schemas where temporary tables are created.
Having
special schemas f
Hi,
I would like to know where I could find the latest available Latch patch. If
anyone knows, please share this information.
Thanks in advance
--
BRs
Shoma
Em 3/1/2011 18:39, Filip Rembiałkowski escreveu:
archiver process will retry later; it never stops trying, sleep time
is just longer.
2011/1/3, Norberto Delle:
Hi all
I have a PostgreSQL 9.0.1 instance, with WAL Archiving.
Today, after some failed tries to archive a WAL file, it stopped trying
"By the very definition of a prepared statement the query plan gets stored
before the parameter values are known"
Is this true for all databases? It would seem to me that this approach would
always lead to the wrong query plan, especially in the case I am testing where
the selectivity is very
Can You try "...BETWEEN ?::date and ?::date ..." syntax or send
statement causing problems?
Kind regards,
Radosław Smogura
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 07:27:42 -0700, "Kurt Westerfeld"
wrote:
"By the very definition of a prepared statement the query plan gets
stored before the parameter values are k
I got a big problem:
Warning: database 'postgres' must be vacuumed within 100 transactions
HINT: To avoid database shutdown, execute a full database vacuum in
'postgres'
Warning: database 'postgres' must be vacuumed within 99 transactions
HINT: To avoid database shutdown, execute a full
On Tuesday 04 January 2011 3:04:29 am André Fernandes wrote:
> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:53:30 +0600
> Subject: [GENERAL] What is pg_toast_temp_* in my DB?
> From: rumman...@gmail.com
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
>
> What is pg_toast_temp_* in my DB?
>
> Hello!
>
> pg_toast_temp_* are some spe
On Tuesday 04 January 2011 4:06:48 am asti1987 wrote:
> I got a big problem:
> Warning: database 'postgres' must be vacuumed within 100 transactions
> HINT: To avoid database shutdown, execute a full database vacuum in
> 'postgres'
>
> Warning: database 'postgres' must be vacuumed within 9
>
> I got a big problem:
> Warning: database 'postgres' must be vacuumed within 100 transactions
> HINT: To avoid database shutdown, execute a full database vacuum in
> 'postgres'
>
> Warning: database 'postgres' must be vacuumed within 99 transactions
> HINT: To avoid database shutdown, e
PostgreSQL 8.4.4 on x86_64-pc-solaris2.10, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.4.3
(csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath), 64-bit
2 large tables (around a billion rows each) recently received attention from
autovacuum. They both currently show up in my currently running queries as
"autovacuum: VACUUM table
First, sorry I didn't mention that I am using PostgreSQL 9, but the problem
existed also on 8.4.
As for the BETWEEN clause, I'm using hibernate and don't want to put a
database-specific SQL query in place.
I also decided to drop a few indexes, which were probably causing the optimizer
to c
In response to "Kurt Westerfeld" :
> >>> Radosław Smogura 1/4/2011 9:48 AM >>>
> Can You try "...BETWEEN ?::date and ?::date ..." syntax or send
> statement causing problems?
>
> As for the BETWEEN clause, I'm using hibernate and don't want to put a
> database-specific SQL query in place.
You
> I will admit that the "Preventing Transaction ID Wraparound Failures"
> chapter in the manual (and the subsequent autovacuum daemon chapter) make
> my head spin.
The basic idea is pretty simple, really. You have a limited amount of
transaction IDs, so you arrange them into a circle, and you are
I has set config.pl to
$config->{perl};
1;
and run build.bat, everything is ok, there is plpgsql.dll but don't found
plperl.dll.
I use strawberry perl 5.10 or must I use ActiveState Perl.
Please help me. Thank in advance
Tuan Hoang ANh
W dniu 4 stycznia 2011 14:55 użytkownik Norberto Delle
napisał:
> Em 3/1/2011 18:39, Filip Rembiałkowski escreveu:
>
> archiver process will retry later; it never stops trying, sleep time
>> is just longer.
>>
>> 2011/1/3, Norberto Delle:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> I have a PostgreSQL 9.0.1 instance,
8.1.23
Im typing ¨vacuum¨ since yesterday in the backend and stop the vacuuming
each 30 minutes, and I try again typing vacuum, but im by the number
890271/100 and its too slow!, i dont know what else to do to make it
faster.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabb
>
> 8.1.23
> Im typing ¨vacuum¨ since yesterday in the backend and stop the vacuuming
> each 30 minutes, and I try again typing vacuum, but im by the number
> 890271/100 and its too slow!, i dont know what else to do to make it
> faster.
Why are you stopping it each 30 minutes? And the fact th
im not stopping, it stops by it self, what parameters i must to change?, how
i do that?
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Warning-database-postgres-must-be-vacuumed-within-100-transactions-tp3326896p3327508.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailin
effected a "vacuum" away from your "pgadmin"
2011/1/4 asti1987
>
> im not stopping, it stops by it self, what parameters i must to change?,
> how
> i do that?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Warning-database-postgres-must-be-vacuumed-within-100-
I just want to say I apologize for over reacting yesterday
As someone guessed I am not even religious so I shouldn't bother. The
reason for my reaction though is that I really like those open source
communities. People are working together collaborating to make things
better for everyone. Then, to
On 01/04/2011 09:01 AM, asti1987 wrote:
8.1.23
Im typing ¨vacuum¨ since yesterday in the backend and stop the vacuuming
each 30 minutes, and I try again typing vacuum, but im by the number
890271/100 and its too slow!, i dont know what else to do to make it
faster.
Per the error message yo
I haven't been able to find anywhere, easily, in the documentation using google
where a list of allowed data types for primary keys is.
So, UUIDs can be primary keys?
Any issues wtih them on sorting or paging of index tables, etc.?
Also, the documentation says that UUIDs are 128 bit value, but n
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 11:07 -0800, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> I haven't been able to find anywhere, easily, in the documentation using
> google
> where a list of allowed data types for primary keys is.
Anything that can be UNIQUE NOT NULL
>
> So, UUIDs can be primary keys?
Yes.
JD
--
PostgreS
We're using UUID for primary keys in PG 8.4 without any issues. I have
no real insights into the details or performance issues, but always
figured it was stored as a binary 128-bit value, but with added benefits
of being able to enter and view them using a standard string format. We
don't sor
Hola gente:
Estoy haciendo un funcion que recibe como parametro fechainicial, fechafin,
horainicial,horafin, y frecuencia. Esta funcion debe generar fechas que
esten dentro del rango de fechas que paso como parametros, y por cada fecha,
debe generar un rango de horas con minutos, pero segun la frec
Hello,
Dnia Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:05:03PM -0600, Michael Satterwhite napisał:
> I'm not fond of the pager function. Is there a way to tell postgresql to
> either default to '\pset pager off' or to have it startup with the pager
> turned
> off?
>From `psql --help':
-P VAR[=ARG]set print
Dominik =?utf-8?B?xbt5xYJh?= writes:
> Dnia Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:05:03PM -0600, Michael Satterwhite napisaÅ:
>> I'm not fond of the pager function. Is there a way to tell postgresql to
>> either default to '\pset pager off' or to have it startup with the pager
>> turned
>> off?
> From `psq
Hola,
hay una portal en espanol sobre postgres con listas de correo y IRC:
http://www.postgresql-es.org/comunidad
Aqui hablamos ingles. Sorry.
saludos desde Alemana.
Matthias
Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2011, um 21:26:33 schrieb liliana lazarte:
> Hola gente:
> Estoy haciendo un funcion que
d.w...@computer.org (David Wall) writes:
> We're using UUID for primary keys in PG 8.4 without any issues. I
> have no real insights into the details or performance issues, but
> always figured it was stored as a binary 128-bit value, but with added
> benefits of being able to enter and view them
I'm putting this on this thread, since it could be related to the issue.
I'm now seeing this in the log on the HSB/SR server. It's happened about 4
times in the past 2 days.
23964 2011-01-04 05:23:00 EST [47]LOG: invalid record length at
6E53/46E8A010
23535 2011-01-04 05:23:00 EST [2]FATAL
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:12, tuanhoanganh wrote:
> I has set config.pl to
> $config->{perl};
> 1;
I don't know anything about the windows build system, but shouldn't
that be something like:
$config->{perl} = 1; ?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make cha
Thanks for answer me but it have error
Detected Visual Studio version 8.00
Detected hardware platform: Win32
Generating win32ver.rc for src\backend
Building src\pl\plperl\SPI.c...
'1' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
Failed to create SPI.c.
Ple
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 19:27, tuanhoanganh wrote:
> Thanks for answer me but it have error
>
> Detected Visual Studio version 8.00
> Detected hardware platform: Win32
> Generating win32ver.rc for src\backend
> Building src\pl\plperl\SPI.c...
> '1' is not recognized as an internal or external comma
Hi. Everytime I boot Windows XP a number of postgres.exe services
start and run in the background. As I am only an occasional user of
postgresql on my laptop I was wondering how (a) I could disable the
auto-start of the service on boot and (b) how to manually start/stop
postgresql when needed?
Th
Thanks you very much
Here is my config.pl
$config->{perl} = "c:\\perl";
1;
Strawberry Perl don't work because It don't have perl lib in
c:\Perl\lib\CORE\.
I swiched to ActivePerl to build plperl.
Tuan Hoang ANh
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 19:27
On 1/4/2011 10:25 PM, Ken wrote:
Hi. Everytime I boot Windows XP a number of postgres.exe services
start and run in the background. As I am only an occasional user of
postgresql on my laptop I was wondering how (a) I could disable the
auto-start of the service on boot and (b) how to manually st
On 01/04/11 7:25 PM, Ken wrote:
Hi. Everytime I boot Windows XP a number of postgres.exe services
start and run in the background. As I am only an occasional user of
postgresql on my laptop I was wondering how (a) I could disable the
auto-start of the service on boot and (b) how to manually sta
38 matches
Mail list logo
