Re: [GENERAL] Table Column Retrieval

2010-02-22 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:23:09PM -0700, dmp wrote: >> >> Recently I read that one of the distinctions between a standard database >> and >> a columnar one, which led to an increase in its efficiency, was and I >> quote: >> >> "Only relevant

Re: [GENERAL] How to Output PSQL Errors to a Log File?

2010-02-22 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:32 -0800, Wang, Mary Y wrote: > No. I dumped the 7.1 with the 7.1 version of pg_dump. > Is it better to dump with the 8.3 version of pg_dump? Since you will be restoring your data to a 8.3 server, you should use 8.3 pg_dump, yes. > I thought I read it some where in the

Re: [GENERAL] Missing clog, PITR

2010-02-22 Thread Patryk Sidzina
> > > > my company has been using pg_standby as a replication solution for a > > while and it has been working great for our needs. Unfortunately, about > > once a month we get the following error on the standby bases: > > > > vacuumdb: vacuuming of database "" failed: ERROR: could not access

<    1   2