Hello.
I'm trying to create a C-procedure returning text variable - again :).
Postgres 8.3.3 (standard binaries - so built by means of MSVC), WinXP SP2.
I also use MSVC 2005 for compilation my library.
Configuration type - Dynamic Library (.dll)
Additional include directories -
D:\pgsql83\include;
Hi all.
I'm new to postgresql world, and I have to extend an existing product
for Thailand - that product has some features based on tsearch, and I
was wondering if there is an existing dictionary for that language... I
failed to find any reference of such dictionary on the web, and of
course
Hi Chaps,
I'm attempting to run 8.3.3 on an old cobalt qube, with debian etch. It
appeared to compile ok (however I didn't stick around to watch, that'd be
painfull) and said "PostgreSQL compiled successfully and ready to install" or
whatever, but when I run make check, fails in initdb.
Here i
Glyn Astill wrote:
Hi Chaps,
I'm attempting to run 8.3.3 on an old cobalt qube, with debian etch.
It appeared to compile ok (however I didn't stick around to watch,
that'd be painfull) and said "PostgreSQL compiled successfully and
ready to install" or whatever, but when I run make check, fails
I assume it's doing it correctly
deb:/home/glyn# cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax
33554432
That's right isn't it?
4096*8192= 33554432
- Original Message
> From: Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Glyn Astill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Sent: Friday, 18
Glyn Astill wrote:
I assume it's doing it correctly
deb:/home/glyn# cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax
33554432
That's right isn't it?
4096*8192= 33554432
Does shmall allow for any more? Other processes may be preventing you
from allocating all that. Of course, ideally you'd get an error message
Francisco Reyes wrote:
The OS triggered the out of memory killer (oom-killer).
The table I am selecting from has a few hundred million rows.
The table I am inserting into has partitions. I am benchmarking breaking
up a large table into smaller partitions.
Is the partition split done with tr
Yes I think it does?
deb:/home/glyn# cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmall
2097152
deb:/home/glyn# getconf PAGE_SIZE
4096
- Original Message
> From: Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Glyn Astill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Sent: Friday, 18 July, 2008 12:36:3
Glyn Astill wrote:
Yes I think it does?
deb:/home/glyn# cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmall
2097152
deb:/home/glyn# getconf PAGE_SIZE
4096
Well, if it's using PAGE_SIZE then that's 8GB which sounds optimistic
for a qube. Presumably it represents some theoretical maximum.
Did a previous version of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Scara Maccai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was looking at the TODO:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html
>>
>>
>> "A hyphen, "-", marks changes that will appear in the upcoming 8.4 release."
>>
>> Well, making a search for
Russ Brown wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Scara Maccai wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I was looking at the TODO:
> >>
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html
> >>
> >>
> >> "A hyphen, "-", marks changes that will appear in the upcoming 8
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Francisco Reyes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Douglas McNaught writes:
>
>
>> It does seem that reducing work_mem might help you, but others on this
>
> I reduced it from 256MB to 64MB. It seems it is helping.
You should also look at your memory overcommit settings
I thought similar, I assumed it was sort sort of generic maximum. The qube is
very old so there's only 196Mb ram in it.
Nope, never tried postgres on this qube before. I've not tried debians package,
it was 8.1 as I recall.
I'll give the package ago purely as a test unless anyone can see any ot
I have my Windows 2008 stand-alone server configured so I can log on using
my MIT Kerberos credentials. I have an SSPI enabled PUTTY which will allow
single-sign-on with Kerberos. This much is working correctly.
My question - does the current ODBC driver support this type of 'native'
configurati
I sent this follow up in yesterday, but it did not show up.
Must be doing something wrong. Here is the second try.
kd
select * from security sec
where getsectypekey('OP') = sec.securitytypekey returns 690 rows
in 1625ms EXPLAIN "Seq Scan on "security" sec (cost=0.00..507.54
rows=602 wid
On 9:53 am 07/18/08 "Douglas McNaught" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dedicated database server you really don't ever want to have the OOM
> killer triggered.
Found that yesterday (vm.overcommit_memory=2).
Agree that this is better than OOM. I still ran out of memory last night
and postgres just fai
On 8:13 am 07/18/08 Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the partition split done with triggers or rules?
I have a single trigger+function combo that dynamically computes which
partition the data has to go to.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To ma
el dorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (By the way, I can't compile it as C++ Code (/TP)
No, you can't.
> 1>d:\pgsql83\getstring\c_getstring.c(75) : warning C4311: 'type cast' :
> pointer truncation from 'char [8]' to 'Datum'
> 1>d:\pgsql83\getstring\c_getstring.c(75) : warning C4312: 'type cas
Glyn Astill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm attempting to run 8.3.3 on an old cobalt qube, with debian etch. It
> appeared to compile ok (however I didn't stick around to watch, that'd be
> painfull) and said "PostgreSQL compiled successfully and ready to install" or
> whatever, but when I run
Francisco Reyes wrote:
On 8:13 am 07/18/08 Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is the partition split done with triggers or rules?
I have a single trigger+function combo that dynamically computes which
partition the data has to go to.
I'm wondering whether it's memory usage either for
On 11:25 am 07/18/08 Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering whether it's memory usage either for the trigger
> itself, or for the function (pl/pgsql?).
Good point.
> If you're doing something
> like:INSERT INTO partitioned_table SELECT * FROM big_table
> then that's not onl
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:40:02AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Found that yesterday (vm.overcommit_memory=2).
> Agree that this is better than OOM. I still ran out of memory last night
> and postgres just failed on the malloc(), which as you mentioned is better.
>
> Reduced work_mem to 8MB and
On 11:25 am 07/18/08 Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Strace of the single/large process.
Again, all the query is doing is
insert into select
The strace is pretty much a repetition of the lines below.
semop(557057, 0x7fbfffdfb0, 1) = 0
lseek(100, 0, SEEK_END)
Hello,
I am trying to code a simple udf in postgres. How do I write sql commands
into pl/sql ? The foll. code doesnt work.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION udf()
RETURNS integer AS $$
BEGIN
for i in 1..2000 loop
for j in 1...1 loop
end loop;
begin work;
declare cust scroll cursor for sele
> You are the first person to ever ask, and searching for ' -' is pretty
> basic. If it is a problem, I think some other symbol should be used.
using opera it doesn't work... and with Firefox you still get a lot of
not-wanted matches...
Of course, this is not a "problem", I was just thinking th
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> On 11:25 am 07/18/08 Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Strace of the single/large process.
> Again, all the query is doing is
> insert into select
>
> The strace is pretty much a repetition of the lines below.
Do you have long-running transactions? (For ex
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Suresh_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I am trying to code a simple udf in postgres. How do I write sql commands
> into pl/sql ? The foll. code doesnt work.
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION udf()
> RETURNS integer AS $$
> BEGIN
> for i in 1..2000 loop
> fo
Could this be any less informative?
Core was generated by
`/usr/pgsql_src/postgresql-8.3.3/src/test/regress/tmp_check/install/usr/local/pg'.
Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.
#0 0x007572d0 in ?? ()
- Original Message
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Glyn Astill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> Is there a way to disable some of the autovacuum logging?
Yes -- upgrade to a newer version.
Autovacuum was primitive in 8.1. It was the first version. Bear with
us.
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replica
Hi Guru,
can a function returns a cursor?
Thank you!
Domenico
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 12:03 pm 07/18/08 Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps you can try reducing the shared_buffers, to see if that helps
> more?
Will try.
> 8MB is quite small for workmem. More shared_buffers is not
> necessarily better.
Ok, but from everything I had read shared_buffers o
On 12:23 pm 07/18/08 Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have long-running transactions? (For example transactions that
> have been idle for a long time).
No.
The two inserts I was running were the only processes. I even did a restart
to make sure there was absolutely nothing else
Glyn Astill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could this be any less informative?
> Core was generated by
> `/usr/pgsql_src/postgresql-8.3.3/src/test/regress/tmp_check/install/usr/local/pg'.
> Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.
> #0 0x007572d0 in ?? ()
Probably not :-(. Did you build wit
No. Will recompile with debug info and post back when done.
- Original Message
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Glyn Astill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Sent: Friday, 18 July, 2008 5:50:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Initdb problem on debian mips c
"Francisco Reyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given that memory grows over time I am beggining to wonder if it is some
> type of memory leak.
Are there any AFTER triggers (including foreign key constraints) on the
table being inserted into? If so the list of pending trigger events
might be your
Glyn Astill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No. Will recompile with debug info and post back when done.
FWIW, the most likely issue here is the MIPS-specific assembly code in
src/include/storage/s_lock.h --- I'm not sure how many MIPS platforms
that's really been exercised on, but it may not work on
--- On Fri, 7/18/08, Glyn Astill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Glyn Astill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [GENERAL] Initdb problem on debian mips cobalt: Bus error
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Date: Friday, July 18, 2008, 10:26 AM
> Hi Chaps,
>
> I'm attempting to run 8.3.3 on an
On 1:00 pm 07/18/08 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any AFTER triggers (including foreign key constraints)
I have two foreign key constraints.
> the table being inserted into? If so the list of pending trigger
> events might be your problem.
I guess I can try disablign the forei
"Francisco Reyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 1:00 pm 07/18/08 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you can get Postgres to report an actual out-of-memory error (as
>> opposed to crashing from OOM kill)
>> then it should dump a memory usage
>> map into the postmaster log. Looking at that
On 3:55 pm 07/18/08 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AfterTriggerEvents: 10553909248 total in 1268 blocks; 20432 free (6
> > chunks); 1055316 used
>
> Well, that's definitely your problem ...
So I need to remove the foreign constraints?
> >HashBatchContext: 415227952 tota
On 18/07/2008 17:07, Suresh_ wrote:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION udf()
RETURNS integer AS $$
BEGIN
for i in 1..2000 loop
for j in 1...1 loop
end loop;
begin work;
^^- Here's your problem!
You can't have a transaction inside a function - the function is already
executed in
I am having a problem with the simplest of Python functions, so I must be
doing something wrong. After hours of searching and trying many options, I
need the key that my puny brain is missing here.
I cannot pass parameters to a plpythonu function. I have tried within psql
and with pgAdmin III (w
On 3:55 pm 07/18/08 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AfterTriggerEvents: 10553909248 total in 1268 blocks; 20432 free (6
> > chunks); 1055316 used
>
> Well, that's definitely your problem ...
What is the overhead for each AfterTriggerEvent?
I guess I can write a program to process so
"Francisco Reyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3:55 pm 07/18/08 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> AfterTriggerEvents: 10553909248 total in 1268 blocks; 20432 free (6
>>> chunks); 1055316 used
>>
>> Well, that's definitely your problem ...
> So I need to remove the foreign constraint
"Francisco Reyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the overhead for each AfterTriggerEvent?
On a 64-bit machine it looks like they'd cost you about 80 bytes
each :-(. A good deal of that is palloc overhead --- I wonder if
we should get rid of the separate-palloc-for-each-event design?
> Whe
-- Original message --
From: "user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am having a problem with the simplest of Python functions, so I must be
> doing something wrong. After hours of searching and trying many options, I
> need the key that my puny brain is missing here.
>
>
On 4:55 pm 07/18/08 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only thing I can think of is that you had a huge number of rows
> with all the same hash value, so that there wasn't any way to split
> the batch into smaller sections. What are the join keys exactly in
> this query, and what can you te
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Daniel Chiaramello wrote:
Hi all.
I'm new to postgresql world, and I have to extend an existing product for
Thailand - that product has some features based on tsearch, and I was
wondering if there is an existing dictionary for that language... I failed to
find any refere
Simon Riggs wrote:
Have a look at pg_snapclone. It's specifically designed to significantly
improve dump times for very large objects.
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/snapclone/
Also, in case the original poster is not aware, by default pg_dump
allows to backup single tables.
Just add -t .
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can anyone give me an example of how to use regexp_matches and use the
captured values?
For instance, if I have a delimited string "a,b,c" and I want to put
each letter into a variable so I can subsequently use those variables in
an insert statem
Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Postgres is indeed selecting a bad plan. Turns out that the index I
> created to speed up the UPDATE isn't used inside a transaction block.
That doesn't make any sense to me, and in fact I cannot replicate any
such behavior here. What PG version a
Shane Ambler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There has been some talk about getting postgres to build as a universal
> binary. The current makefiles don't support the option but a couple of
> people have come up with work arounds. I do believe that there are plans
> to add this to future releases.
52 matches
Mail list logo
