FW: [GENERAL] Getting information about sequences

2006-05-16 Thread Forums @ Existanze
Hello all again, Thank you for all of your replies, We are creating a jdbc backup solution that does NOT require the pgdump program. We have managed to get it going pretty fast, and the output size at the moment is rellativelly smaller, but anyway. Most of the key information you can get from t

Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface

2006-05-16 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: A.M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 May 2006 15:05 > To: Dave Page > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface > > > > I'm unable to reproduce this problem with pgAdmin SVN-trunk > built with > > wxGTK 2.6.3 on Slackware-current with KDE. > > > > Can an

[GENERAL] problems with postgresql 9

2006-05-16 Thread romeo midhun
  hi friends, Why the 'oid' column reference doesn't work with postgresql 9.x?

Re: [GENERAL] problems with postgresql 9

2006-05-16 Thread Alban Hertroys
romeo midhun wrote: hi friends, Why the 'oid' column reference doesn't work with postgresql 9.x? Hiya, time traveller. You ended up in the wrong year; PostgreSQL 9 doesn't exist yet. -- Alban Hertroys [EMAIL PROTECTED] magproductions b.v. T: ++31(0)534346874 F: ++31(0)534346876 M: I: ww

Re: [GENERAL] problems with postgresql 9

2006-05-16 Thread A. Kretschmer
am 16.05.2006, um 11:18:09 +0200 mailte Alban Hertroys folgendes: > romeo midhun wrote: > > hi friends, > >Why the 'oid' column reference doesn't work with postgresql 9.x? > > Hiya, time traveller. You ended up in the wrong year; PostgreSQL 9 doesn't > exist yet. ;-) Btw.: if you need the oid,

Re: [GENERAL] Postmaster cannot start

2006-05-16 Thread Chun Yit\(Chronos\)
What i done is i use the last backup file and restore it on new $PGData Directory, now it ok. just curious how this thing can happen? maybe i asking a stupid question since i using quite old Postgresql Version but hoping this problem won't come back again. Thanks for your help to clear some d

[GENERAL] FATAL: could not read statistics message

2006-05-16 Thread Sean Davis
I am using postgresql 8.1.0 on an Xserver running MacOS 10.3.9. I am getting the following in the log every minute for the past couple of days. The database is otherwise running normally, as far as I can tell: 2006-05-16 07:26:01 EDT FATAL: could not read statistics message: Resource temporari

Re: [GENERAL] best practice in upgrading db structure

2006-05-16 Thread Csaba Nagy
[leaving the original text, as it is reply to an older posting] On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 21:26, Jim Nasby wrote: > On Mar 29, 2006, at 3:25 AM, Csaba Nagy wrote: > > >> Could somebody explain me, or point me to a resource where I can find > >> out what is the recommended practice when a live db need

Re: [GENERAL] can't reindex a couple of tables

2006-05-16 Thread Brendan Duddridge
Hi Jim, I must have had a corrupt index as vacuum analyze verbose came back with an error and crapped out the postgres instance. Once I re- indexed the problem went away. This issue hasn't returned since re- indexing. Thanks, brendan duddridge | CTO | 403-520-5793 x24 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [GENERAL] Bug in ordered views?

2006-05-16 Thread Sebastian Böck
Tom Lane wrote: Nis Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Try removing the DISTINCT ON from your view - that should make things clearer to you. When t.approved is true, the row is joined to all rows of the datum table satisfying the criteria. The sort order you specify does not guarantee a uniq

[GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1)

2006-05-16 Thread Rafael Martinez, Guerrero
Hello Today, one user complained that one of the tickets in our system had disappeared some places but could be accessed other places. I thought this was weird and startet debugging. I have found out the sql statement with 'problems'. Can anybody explain me why A) returns 12 rows and B) returns 1

Re: FW: [GENERAL] Getting information about sequences

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
"Forums @ Existanze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We are creating a jdbc backup solution that does NOT require the pgdump > program. In heaven's name, WHY? Do you have any idea how much future pain you are setting yourself up for? pg_dump changes with every PG release to deal with new features

Re: FW: [GENERAL] Getting information about sequences

2006-05-16 Thread Forums @ Existanze
Does pg_dump run in Macintosh? > -Original Message- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 May 2006 17:22 > To: Forums @ Existanze > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: FW: [GENERAL] Getting information about sequences > > "Forums @ Existanze" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: FW: [GENERAL] Getting information about sequences

2006-05-16 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
pg_dump runs on any platform postgres does. On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:31:44PM +0300, Forums @ Existanze wrote: > Does pg_dump run in Macintosh? > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 16 May 2006 17:22 > > To: Forums @ Existanze > > Cc: pgs

Re: FW: [GENERAL] Getting information about sequences

2006-05-16 Thread Forums @ Existanze
Here is the thing, the user doesn't have Postgres installed on his/her computer. So how am I going to distribute pg_dump, from my understandin you have to compile postgres on a Mac in order to get the pgdump executable. And is this for every version of Mac? > -Original Message- > From: M

Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1)

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
"Rafael Martinez, Guerrero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have found out the sql statement with 'problems'. Can anybody explain > me why A) returns 12 rows and B) returns 13 rows?. The only different is > the "open OR new" / "new OR open" part. Should not they return the samme > result? That is

Re: FW: [GENERAL] Getting information about sequences

2006-05-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Forums @ Existanze wrote: Does pg_dump run in Macintosh? Wait you are going to "creating a jdbc backup solution" that does NOT require the pgdump program, and you don't know if pg_dump runs on Macintosh? PostgreSQL operates on every major OS platform. I strongly suggest you read the

Re: [GENERAL] Getting information about sequences

2006-05-16 Thread Gavin M. Roy
Do you mean every version of OS X? I will not run on OS 9, afaik. It can be compiled against any version of OS X, again as far as I know. Gavin On May 16, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Forums @ Existanze wrote: Here is the thing, the user doesn't have Postgres installed on his/her computer. So how am

Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1)

2006-05-16 Thread Rafael Martinez
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Rafael Martinez, Guerrero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have found out the sql statement with 'problems'. Can anybody explain > > me why A) returns 12 rows and B) returns 13 rows?. The only different is > > the "open OR new" / "new OR open"

Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1)

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
Rafael Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I suspect this may be a question of a corrupt index, in which case >> REINDEXing the index being used would fix it. > This is what I thought when I found out the problem. So before I sent my > fir

Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1)

2006-05-16 Thread Rafael Martinez
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 12:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Rafael Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I suspect this may be a question of a corrupt index, in which case > >> REINDEXing the index being used would fix it. > > > This is what I

Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1)

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
Rafael Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> So much for that theory. If you copy the table (create table foo as >> select * from tickets) and build a similar index on the copy, does the >> behavior persist in the copy? > The new table behave

[GENERAL] Namespace issues

2006-05-16 Thread Don Y
Given a user defined type foo... I've created several casts to/from foo and built-in types. I had adopted a naming convention of: baz foo_to_baz(foo); foo foo_from_baz(baz); But: ...it is recommended that you continue to follow this old convention of naming cast implementation functions

Re: [GENERAL] error handling in cast functions for user defined types

2006-05-16 Thread Don Y
Tom Lane wrote: Don Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I'm writing a set of casts to/from various user defined types. As is unexpected, there are cases where one data type doesn't neatly map to another (for certain values). In these cases I emit an INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE or OUT_OF_RANGE error -- d

Re: [GENERAL] Namespace issues

2006-05-16 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:29:27AM -0700, Don Y wrote: > Given a user defined type foo... > I've created several casts to/from foo and built-in types. > I had adopted a naming convention of: > baz foo_to_baz(foo); > foo foo_from_baz(baz); > > But: > I don't see how I can do this in my decla

Re: [GENERAL] best practice in upgrading db structure

2006-05-16 Thread Kenneth Downs
Csaba Nagy wrote: [leaving the original text, as it is reply to an older posting] On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 21:26, Jim Nasby wrote: On Mar 29, 2006, at 3:25 AM, Csaba Nagy wrote: Could somebody explain me, or point me to a resource where I can find out what i

Re: [GENERAL] Namespace issues

2006-05-16 Thread Don Y
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:29:27AM -0700, Don Y wrote: Given a user defined type foo... I've created several casts to/from foo and built-in types. I had adopted a naming convention of: baz foo_to_baz(foo); foo foo_from_baz(baz); But: I don't see how I can

Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1)

2006-05-16 Thread Rafael Martinez
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 13:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Rafael Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> So much for that theory. If you copy the table (create table foo as > >> select * from tickets) and build a similar index on the copy, does t

Re: [GENERAL] Namespace issues

2006-05-16 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:53:10AM -0700, Don Y wrote: > But what *binds* my C declaration to the corresponding SQL > "CREATE CAST"? > > E.g., > > CREATE FUNCTION foo_from_baz(baz) > RETURNS foo > AS '...' > LANGUAGE 'C' IMMUTABLE STRICT; Your create functions would look like: CREATE FUNCTION f

[GENERAL] Partitioning on ip4 datatype using <<=

2006-05-16 Thread Michael Artz
I'm trying to partition my table on the first octet of an ip4 column and can't seem to get the planner to do the constraint_exclusion. The following SQL (copied by hand): CREATE TABLE a (ip ip4); CREATE TABLE a_1 ( CHECK (ip <<= '1.0.0.0/8' ) INHERITS(a); CREATE TABLE a_2 ( CHECK (ip <<= '2.0.0.0

Re: [GENERAL] Friendly catalog views

2006-05-16 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:14:05PM -0500, Russ Brown wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 17:12 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:08:46PM -0300, Bruno Almeida do Lago wrote: > > > Sometime ago I saw a project with the purpose of creating Oracle views > > > over > > > the PostgreS

Re: [GENERAL] Partitioning on ip4 datatype using <<=

2006-05-16 Thread Michael Artz
Forgot important part ... running on RHEL 4 Update 3 x86_64 using the 8.1.3 PG distributed in the RH Web Application Beta. SELECT version() PostgreSQL 8.1.3 on x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC x86_64-redhat-linux-gcc (GCC) 3.4.5 20051201 (Red Hat 3.4.5-2) -Mike

[GENERAL] Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres

2006-05-16 Thread Kenneth Downs
Hello folks, My company has developed an application development framework that targets PostgreSQL as its back-end, with PHP in the web layer. We are inviting any early adopters who may wish to experiment to download and install the code. You may contact me off-list with any support or oth

Re: [GENERAL] FATAL: could not read statistics message

2006-05-16 Thread Tony Wasson
On 5/16/06, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am using postgresql 8.1.0 on an Xserver running MacOS 10.3.9. I am getting the following in the log every minute for the past couple of days. The database is otherwise running normally, as far as I can tell: 2006-05-16 07:26:01 EDT FATAL: c

Re: [GENERAL] FATAL: could not read statistics message

2006-05-16 Thread Sean Davis
On 5/16/06 3:08 PM, "Tony Wasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/16/06, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am using postgresql 8.1.0 on an Xserver running MacOS 10.3.9. I am >> getting the following in the log every minute for the past couple of days. >> The database is otherwise ru

Re: [GENERAL] Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres

2006-05-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Kenneth Downs wrote: Hello folks, My company has developed an application development framework that targets PostgreSQL as its back-end, with PHP in the web layer. We are inviting any early adopters who may wish to experiment to download and install the code. You may contact me off-list wi

Re: [GENERAL] Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres

2006-05-16 Thread Kenneth Downs
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Kenneth Downs wrote: Hello folks, My company has developed an application development framework that targets PostgreSQL as its back-end, with PHP in the web layer. We are inviting any early adopters who may wish to experiment to download and install the code. You

[GENERAL] Is it me, or the list?

2006-05-16 Thread Kenneth Downs
I participate regularly on three mailing lists, including pgsql-general. I use thunderbird for mail. pgsql-general has the peculiar property, when I hit reply, of replying not to the list, but the individual who emailed to the list. Is this me, or is this the list? begin:vcard fn:Kenneth D

Re: [GENERAL] Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres

2006-05-16 Thread David Fetter
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:02:36PM -0400, Kenneth Downs wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > >Kenneth Downs wrote: > > > >>Hello folks, > >> > >>My company has developed an application development framework that > >>targets PostgreSQL as its back-end, with PHP in the web layer. > >> > >>We are inv

Re: [GENERAL] Is it me, or the list?

2006-05-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Kenneth Downs wrote: > I participate regularly on three mailing lists, including > pgsql-general. I use thunderbird for mail. > > pgsql-general has the peculiar property, when I hit reply, of replying > not to the list, but the individual who emailed to the list. > > Is this me, or is this the

Re: [GENERAL] Is it me, or the list?

2006-05-16 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 15:04, Kenneth Downs wrote: > I participate regularly on three mailing lists, including > pgsql-general. I use thunderbird for mail. > > pgsql-general has the peculiar property, when I hit reply, of replying > not to the list, but the individual who emailed to the list. >

[GENERAL] bytea hex input/output

2006-05-16 Thread Michael Artz
Silly little question, but is there something to input/output hex escaped data into a bytea, ala CREATE TABLE a (lob BYTEA); INSERT into a (lob) VALUES ('\x01\x02\x00\x03\x04'); INSERT into a (lob) VALUES ('\x01\x00\x02\x00\x03\x04'); It seems to work (doesn't error), but when selecting the data

Re: [GENERAL] problems with postgresql 9

2006-05-16 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:24:38AM +0200, A. Kretschmer wrote: > am 16.05.2006, um 11:18:09 +0200 mailte Alban Hertroys folgendes: > > romeo midhun wrote: > > > hi friends, > > >Why the 'oid' column reference doesn't work with postgresql 9.x? > > > > Hiya, time traveller. You ended up in the wron

Re: [GENERAL] FATAL: could not read statistics message

2006-05-16 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:41:07PM -0400, Sean Davis wrote: > I had cranked things up a bit from the standard install. > > shared_buffers = 15000 # min 16 or max_connections*2, 8KB > each > #temp_buffers = 1000# min 100, 8KB each > #max_prepared_transactions =

[GENERAL] Type checking

2006-05-16 Thread Don Y
Hi, I have several user defined types with particular restraints upon the data they represent. If I have crafted my foo_in() function to ensure that these constraints are always satisfied *before* allowing a datum into the database AND I have designed my casts to be similarly vigilant, is there

Re: [GENERAL] Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres

2006-05-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Sounds great! But why GPL? Are you looking to sell licenses? GPL is to spread it as far and wide as possible as fast as possible. LGPL? My concern would be, I can't use this toolkit for a closed source application if it is GPL. That may be your intent (which I actually don't have a busin

Re: [GENERAL] FATAL: could not read statistics message

2006-05-16 Thread Tony Wasson
On 5/16/06, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I had cranked things up a bit from the standard install. shared_buffers = 15000 # min 16 or max_connections*2, 8KB each #temp_buffers = 1000# min 100, 8KB each #max_prepared_transactions = 50 # can be

Re: [GENERAL] Is it me, or the list?

2006-05-16 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:04:28PM -0400, Kenneth Downs wrote: > I participate regularly on three mailing lists, including > pgsql-general. I use thunderbird for mail. > > pgsql-general has the peculiar property, when I hit reply, of replying > not to the list, but the individual who emailed to

Re: [GENERAL] Type checking

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
Don Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I.e., if I have a bunch of functions defined as taking an > argument of type "foo", is there any way the user can pass > a value to these functions WITHOUT it going through my > gatekeepers (foo_in(), foo_from_baz(), etc.)? No, not if foo is a separate type. Po

Re: [GENERAL] bytea hex input/output

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
"Michael Artz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Silly little question, but is there something to input/output hex > escaped data into a bytea, ala PQescapeBytea, perhaps? The way you are doing it has multiple problems. regards, tom lane ---(end of br

Re: [GENERAL] FATAL: could not read statistics message

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
"Tony Wasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I saw the same error as you, the stats collector process was > missing. The collector, or the buffer process? The reported message would be emitted by the buffer process, after which it would immediately exit. (The collector would go away too once

Re: [GENERAL] Partitioning on ip4 datatype using <<=

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
"Michael Artz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm trying to partition my table on the first octet of an ip4 column > and can't seem to get the planner to do the constraint_exclusion. The > following SQL (copied by hand): > CREATE TABLE a (ip ip4); > CREATE TABLE a_1 ( CHECK (ip <<= '1.0.0.0/8' ) I

Re: [GENERAL] FATAL: could not read statistics message

2006-05-16 Thread Sean Davis
Jim C. Nasby wrote: On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:41:07PM -0400, Sean Davis wrote: I had cranked things up a bit from the standard install. shared_buffers = 15000 # min 16 or max_connections*2, 8KB each #temp_buffers = 1000# min 100, 8KB each #max_prepared_t

Re: [GENERAL] FATAL: could not read statistics message

2006-05-16 Thread Tony Wasson
On 5/16/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Tony Wasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I saw the same error as you, the stats collector process was > missing. The collector, or the buffer process? The reported message would be emitted by the buffer process, after which it would immedi

Re: [GENERAL] FATAL: could not read statistics message

2006-05-16 Thread Sean Davis
Tony Wasson wrote: On 5/16/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Tony Wasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I saw the same error as you, the stats collector process was > missing. The collector, or the buffer process? The reported message would be emitted by the buffer process, after

Re: [GENERAL] bytea hex input/output

2006-05-16 Thread Michael Artz
Eh, I'll just convert it all to octal, I just thought that I could get away without any middleman.What ig going on behind the scenes?  Does it first get converted to text and then on to bytea?  Would an explicit cast get around this (perhaps with associated UDF)? -MikeOn 5/16/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL P

Re: [GENERAL] Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres

2006-05-16 Thread Kenneth Downs
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Sounds great! But why GPL? Are you looking to sell licenses? GPL is to spread it as far and wide as possible as fast as possible. LGPL? My concern would be, I can't use this toolkit for a closed source application if it is GPL. That may be your intent (which I

Re: [GENERAL] Is it me, or the list?

2006-05-16 Thread Kenneth Downs
Scott Marlowe wrote: On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 15:04, Kenneth Downs wrote: I participate regularly on three mailing lists, including pgsql-general. I use thunderbird for mail. pgsql-general has the peculiar property, when I hit reply, of replying not to the list, but the individual

Re: [GENERAL] bytea hex input/output

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
"Michael Artz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What ig going on behind the scenes? Does it first get converted to text and > then on to bytea? No, the \nnn escape is built into the lexer's syntax for a string literal (see backend/parser/scan.l), and only after that does the string get fed to bytea'

[GENERAL] Contributing code

2006-05-16 Thread Don Y
Hi, Is it possible to have one of my user defined data types reviewed/critiqued to see if there are things that I am not doing properly? Or, other things that I should be including? Or, should I just contribute it and hope for the best? (if so, how do I do that?) Thanks! --don --

Re: [GENERAL] Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
Kenneth Downs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If it turns out that nobody can release a closed source app, I will > definitely reconsider and look again at LGPL, but I am not convinced you > cannot do so. > If you seek to provide a closed source app that is built upon Andromeda, > you are require

Re: [GENERAL] bytea hex input/output

2006-05-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > "Michael Artz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What ig going on behind the scenes? Does it first get converted to text and > > then on to bytea? > > No, the \nnn escape is built into the lexer's syntax for a string > literal (see backend/parser/scan.l), and only after that does

Re: [GENERAL] bytea hex input/output

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> No, the \nnn escape is built into the lexer's syntax for a string >> literal (see backend/parser/scan.l), > Should we rethink this for SQL standard strings? We already have: \ isn't an escape anymore when standard_conforming_strings is true.

Re: [GENERAL] Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres

2006-05-16 Thread Tim Allen
Kenneth Downs wrote: GPL is to spread it as far and wide as possible as fast as possible. LGPL? My concern would be, I can't use this toolkit for a closed source application if it is GPL. That may be your intent (which I actually don't have a business problem with), I was just curious as t

Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface

2006-05-16 Thread Christopher Browne
> Also most DBAs are not hard core OSS programmers and anyone coming > from a commercial system is more than likely used to running the > admin tools on windows. We have a whole department of DBAs, *none* of whom have Microsoft on their desktops. Further, the Big, Important Systems that we admini

Re: [GENERAL] Contributing code

2006-05-16 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:12:05PM -0700, Don Y wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to have one of my user defined data types > reviewed/critiqued to see if there are things that I am > not doing properly? Or, other things that I should be > including? Or, should I just contribute it and hope > for

[GENERAL] [Linux] Suitable 64bit

2006-05-16 Thread Scott Venter
Good morning all, I am running SUSE 10 (64bit) and need to download an rpm or other suitable binary for this platform. At the download site there only seem to be binaries for Redhat and Fedora. There also only seems to be a 64bit binary for Fedora Core 4 and none for Core 5. Can anyone advis

Re: [GENERAL] Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres

2006-05-16 Thread Anastasios Hatzis
Kenneth Downs wrote: My company has developed an application development framework that targets PostgreSQL as its back-end, with PHP in the web layer. Is this product somehow related to AndroMDA (which is usually pronounced 'Andromeda')? http://www.andromda.org/ Greetings, Anastasios ---