Hello Tom
Do you know that this compiler generates trustworthy code with those
options? The contents of the pg_control file are clearly good according
to the dump from pg_controldata, and yet we have
Perhaps we should use others options, could you tell us which are the
write options with i
> George Pavlov wrote:
> > they have the same kind of page setup for pg Admin:
> >
> > http://pgsql.navicat.com/PG_Admin/index.php
> >
> > this one renders...
> >
> > both pages seem to tell robots not to cache them, so can't view a
> > cached view on google.
>
>
> At least PG Admin is free s
Carl Conard wrote:
I've successfully installed Postgres 8.1.2 on WS 2003 R2 on a Lenovo
(IBM) ThinkPad. I used the default installation options and everything
seems peachy keen for a single user (using localhost).
However, when we started performance testing Postgres (vs. MySQL) using
a 3rd
Its not a macro.I meant that the code generated by
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) by configure.in for "configure"does not have
"#include ". Hence function is not detected(unresolved
getaddrinfo).Hence I thought AC_TRY_LINK could give test program
instead of AC_REPLACE_FUNCS taking one.$ di
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:33:13PM +0530, R, Rajesh (STSD) wrote:
> Its not a macro.
> I meant that the code generated by AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) by
> configure.in for "configure"
> does not have "#include ". Hence function is not
> detected(unresolved getaddrinfo).
> Hence I thought AC_TR
surabhi.ahuja wrote:
The exact message i saw is this:
LOG: received fast shutdown request LOG: aborting any active
transactions FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator
command
so does this mean that someone is trying to stop postmaster by
sending it a kill signal?
Someone or som
George Pavlov wrote:
Did you try NULL AS ''?
yes i did. that is the default and does not change the outcome (same
errors about trying to insert an empty string into a numeric field.
Well there's your problem. Quotes tend to imply a text field. Assuming
you don't want to write a short Perl sc
> -Original Message-
> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 January 2006 09:05
> To: Tony Caduto; George Pavlov
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Dave Page
> Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Does this look ethical to you?
>
> > George Pavlov wrote:
> > > th
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 14:26:28 -0700,
Assad Jarrahian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a table called X
> it contains 3 fields of importance(amongst others).
> time (timestamp), snooze (int) , inbox (int)
>
> The time column sometimes has null values.
> What I want is that every
sorry. It is a macro.so, would it be better to
check for the macroas suggested by Tom or go with this patch$ diff -r configure.in configure.in.new918a919>
AC_MSG_CHECKING([for getaddrinfo])920c921,926<
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo])---> AC_TRY_LINK([#include
#include
],>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 02:05:41 -0800,
bgolda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, this is my first post, please don't shoot...
>
> I was just experimenting with transactions (PG 8.1), and there is
> something which puzzles me. If i write 'SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL
> SERIALIZABLE;' in my f
hi,
i have a database storing XML documents.
The main table contains the nodes of the document, the other tables contain
data for each node (depending on the node's type : ELE, Text, PI, ...)
My test document has 115000 nodes.
the export of the document(extracting all informations from database
This is sort of a feature request, I suppose. I solved my problem, but
"NOT HAVING" seems to match better with the desired result or the way
you phrase the question in your mind, if that makes any sense...
I was hoping to write a query rather short by using a "NOT HAVING"
clause. The documenta
On Jan 24, 2006, at 20:00 , Alban Hertroys wrote:
Though this does give the right results, I would have liked to be
able to use NOT HAVING. Or is there a way using HAVING that would
give the same results? I'm quite sure HAVING sort_order <> 1
doesn't mean the same thing.
Why are you so s
Hi,
SELECT object_id
FROM image
GROUP BY object_id
NOT HAVING sort_order = 1;
After changing the "NOT HAVING" to "HAVING" the error message was
"column "sort_order" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in
an aggregate function"
The postgres document says "SELECT list and HAVING clau
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jan 24, 2006, at 20:00 , Alban Hertroys wrote:
Though this does give the right results, I would have liked to be
able to use NOT HAVING. Or is there a way using HAVING that would
give the same results? I'm quite sure HAVING sort_order <> 1 doesn't
mean the sam
I have been using a postgresql 8.0.4 server under freebsd 5.4 like a
charm for a long time .
Yesterday, I upgraded freebsd from 5.4 to 6 via
the CD (the iso was downloaded from ftp.freebsd.org).
Restating
postgresql it happened:
# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/010.pgsql.sh start
--:
not found
FATAL: X
Alban,
what you want is to put the "sort_order <> 1" in the WHERE clause, not
in the HAVING clause. Then it will do what you want.
Cheers,
Csaba.
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:51, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 24, 2006, at 20:00 , Alban Hertroys wrote:
> >
> >> T
Alban Hertroys wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jan 24, 2006, at 20:00 , Alban Hertroys wrote:
Though this does give the right results, I would have liked to be
able to use NOT HAVING. Or is there a way using HAVING that would
give the same results? I'm quite sure HAVING sort_order <> 1
Richard Huxton wrote:
Alban Hertroys wrote:
You're mixing up WHERE and HAVING. The WHERE clause applies to the
individual rows before GROUP BY. The HAVING applies to the output of the
GROUP BY stage.
Ah, of course, now it makes sense. Combined with Csaba's reply my
original problem has vapor
Dave Page wrote:
There most certainly are companies making money from pgAdmin, including
at least 2 of the most well known large PostgreSQL companies. In
addition to potentially hurting them, you are trading off our long
established name, which to add insult to injury you haven't even spelt
or f
Alban Hertroys wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Jan 24, 2006, at 20:00 , Alban Hertroys wrote:
Though this does give the right results, I would have liked to be
able to use NOT HAVING. Or is there a way using HAVING that would
give the same results? I'm quite sure HAVING sort_order <>
Alban Hertroys wrote:
Richard Huxton wrote:
Alban Hertroys wrote:
You're mixing up WHERE and HAVING. The WHERE clause applies to the
individual rows before GROUP BY. The HAVING applies to the output of
the GROUP BY stage.
Ah, of course, now it makes sense. Combined with Csaba's reply my
You're right, but only if there's no GROUP BY. As soon as you use a
GROUP BY _and_ the mentioned WHERE clause, the result will be what the
OP wanted... or you could use SELECT DISTINCT for what he wanted.
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 15:02, Will Glynn wrote:
> Alban Hertroys wrote:
>
> > Richard Huxton
OK, I really didn't think it through, GROUP BY or DISTINCT won't help
here. Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Csaba.
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 15:11, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> You're right, but only if there's no GROUP BY. As soon as you use a
> GROUP BY _and_ the mentioned WHERE clause, the result will be what
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Caduto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 January 2006 13:56
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Does this look ethical to you?
>
> Those companies simply bundle pgAdmin III, they don't sell
> it, there is
>
> > There most certainly are companies making money from pgAdmin,
> > including at least 2 of the most well known large PostgreSQL
> > companies. In addition to potentially hurting them, you are trading
> > off our long established name, which to add insult to injury you
> > haven't even spelt
There most certainly are companies making money from pgAdmin, including
at least 2 of the most well known large PostgreSQL companies. In
addition to potentially hurting them, you are trading off our long
established name, which to add insult to injury you haven't even spelt
or formatted correctl
> -Original Message-
> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 January 2006 14:22
> To: Tony Caduto; Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Does this look ethical to you?
>
>
> > pgAdmin does not play fair either, if you want to talk f
Hi,
Is there any documentation or wiki on PostgreSQL best practices? For example:
- run vacuum regularly and how to judge the frequency of running vacuum
- when to use rule or trigger
- etc.
What I realized is that I joined PostgreSQL's mailing list and kept some of
the advise that I feel migh
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 08:24 -0600, Tony Caduto wrote:
> No how about getting a link or something in the win32 Postgresql
> installer back to the commercial products page:
> http://www.postgresql.org/download/commercial
Are you kidding?
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503
Agnes Bocchino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you have some explanation or/and tips on how to build a successfull
> rpm on ia64, with icc,
> perhaps we shoud not please tell us
Perhaps you should use gcc?
I don't personally have the time or interest to dig into this.
Considering that PG
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Caduto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 January 2006 14:25
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Does this look ethical to you?
>
>
> > There most certainly are companies making money from
> pgAdmin, includin
Richard Huxton writes:
> surabhi.ahuja wrote:
>> so does this mean that someone is trying to stop postmaster by
>> sending it a kill signal?
> Someone or something. It can be Linux's out-of-memory facility picking
> processes to kill. Google "oom killer" for discussion.
No, because the OOM kill
You're kidding, right? Should we also mention in the PostgreSQL
installer that you should perhaps look at Oracle or DB2?
No I am not kidding, it's more akin to MS bundling a web browser and a
media player. That would be a more appropiate example. MS does it to
destroy competitors. I unders
I want to implement a UDF that can accept a parameter which is a tuple of any table, and returns the number of NULL attributes in this tuple. Different tables may have different schemas. How can I implement this function? Thanks.
andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Caduto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 January 2006 14:57
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Magnus Hagander; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Does this look ethical to you?
>
>
> No I am not kidding, it's more akin to MS bundling a web
Thank you, however I'm more concerned with:
"PGLA has many advanced features not found in pgAdmin III,".
Aside from it being slightly misleading (not only are there not many
'advanced' things PGLA can do that pgAdmin can't, there are a similar
number that pgAdmin can, that PGLA can't), it is sti
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Caduto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 January 2006 15:24
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Does this look ethical to you?
>
> I changed it to say PGLA has many advanced GUI features not found in
> other
Yl Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want to implement a UDF that can accept a parameter which is a tuple of
> any table, and returns the number of NULL attributes in this tuple.
> Different tables may have different schemas. How can I implement this
> function? Thanks.
You could do that in C,
UNSUBSCRIBE
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> This is sort of a feature request, I suppose. I solved my problem, but
> "NOT HAVING" seems to match better with the desired result or the way
> you phrase the question in your mind, if that makes any sense...
One problem is that HAVING really works on
Vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FATAL: XX000: failed to initialize lc_messages to ""
> LOCATION: InitializeGUCOptions, guc.c:3699
We've seen that reported before, on more than one platform (I recall
hearing about it on OS X, for instance). But no one's ever been able
to explain what caus
check
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-novice/2005-02/msg00227.php
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 07:56 -0600, Tony Caduto wrote:
> I don't think mentioning a product as a alternative to pgAdmin III is
> wrong since pgAdmin III has such a big advantage being distributed
> with
> the Windows version of Postgresql. It almost has monopoly written on
> it
> since the
Hi,
> How about software RAID?
>
> Linux software RAID appears to perform better than most RAID
> controllers except perhaps those that can do read interleaving
> for RAID1 (I believe some 3ware controllers can do it). Linux
> RAID mirroring doesn't do read interleaving, only read
> balancing, w
Tony Caduto wrote:
Thank you, however I'm more concerned with:
"PGLA has many advanced features not found in pgAdmin III,".
Aside from it being slightly misleading (not only are there not many
'advanced' things PGLA can do that pgAdmin can't, there are a similar
number that pgAdmin can, that PG
Tom Lane wrote:
Yl Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I want to implement a UDF that can accept a parameter which is a tuple of
any table, and returns the number of NULL attributes in this tuple.
Different tables may have different schemas. How can I implement this
function? Thanks.
You could d
Every once in a while I've noticed the number of processes I've got
running jumps up a little higher than normal. So I check it out and
realize that I'm building up a bunch of processes that just aren't
completing. About half of the one's not completing say "SELECT
waiting". I'm not doin
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> We (pginstaller hat goes on) don't know of any competing products. We
will be happy to consider bundling any competing product, including PG
Lightning Admin. One of the most important things in order to be
distributed as part of an open source product is that the parts a
> the personal expense of numerous people including myself. Why
> should we advertise your or anyone elses commercial products
> for free?>
>
> Because the installer is not letting it be known that there
> are alternatives available, I have had many people tell me
> they had no idea there whe
Richard Huxton writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> You could do that in C, but none of the available PLs support it.
> How would you define the signature for the function? One parameter of
> type anyelement?
Type RECORD would be a better choice --- ANYELEMENT allows scalar types
which is not what you
Rick Gigger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Every once in a while I've noticed the number of processes I've got
> running jumps up a little higher than normal. So I check it out and
> realize that I'm building up a bunch of processes that just aren't
> completing. About half of the one's not
Yes, that is all I am asking. Sorry about the MS reference, but I
needed to make a point :-)
I'd find it reasonable to add a blurb somewhere about "note that there
are other tools and addons available. See for example
http://www.postgresql.org/download"; or something like that. That
certainly
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
I am kind of ticked off that they are hijacking my product name this
way.
Yep, but they were using direct links, and I changed any verbage I had
immediatly when Dave asked me to.
If navicat had mentioned my product in their web page I really wouldn't
care, but they
Hi all,
As the subject says, I would like to access a temporary table of another
session, while being the postgres superuser. Is this possible somehow ?
The problem is that I lost the terminal of the other session and I
really would like to see the results (even if partial) of some long
running op
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Tony Caduto wrote:
You are not letting the user make a choice about which admin tool to use
or even try...
My understanding was that pgInstaller gave you the option to install
pgAdmin III, it isn't a *requirement* to install it, like it is with your
analogy of M$+IE ...
I don't wan't to be bundled, I just want it to be known that there are
alternatives available.
I don't think it is reasonable to expect the OSS project within the OSS
installer to mention commercial alternatives IF
they are shipping an already available OSS product.
What I mean is that th
> Quotes tend to imply a text field.
I think you meant to say "quotes imply a non-null text field". And, yes,
I am quite aware of that. The point of the thread was to see if there is
any way of avoiding/overriding that assumption.
> Assuming
> you don't want to write a short Perl script to pre-
Do you mean this function? Seems I cannot get much information from it.../* * record_out - output routine for pseudo-type RECORD. */Datumrecord_out(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS){ elog(ERROR, "Cannot display a value of type %s", "RECORD");
PG_RETURN_VOID(); /* keep compiler quiet */}On
Csaba Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As the subject says, I would like to access a temporary table of another
> session, while being the postgres superuser. Is this possible somehow ?
No. It is not a matter of permissions, it is a matter of physically not
having access to the data: buffers fo
Yl Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you mean this function? Seems I cannot get much information from it...
That would appear to be Postgres 7.3 :-(
You need a considerably newer version of Postgres if you want to do much
of anything useful with unspecified-type records. 8.0 has most of that
But I have to use 7.3 due to some limitations. Can I do it in 7.3? On 1/24/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yl Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you mean this function? Seems I cannot get much information from it...That would appear to be Postgres 7.3 :-(You need a considerably newer ver
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
At 10:00 AM 9/20/2005 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Sep 14, 2005, at 9:45 AM, vinita bansal wrote:
I have a 4 proc. AMD Opteron machine with 32 GB RAM and ~400GB HDD
Just curious what ever came of this?
Also, were you reading the DB and writing the
I have a table that I am using to hold
keys for M:M relationships. I have six fields that can hold the
keys and I do this because I validate the key with a foreign key constraint.
Fields evevid1, evevid2 hold keys from the event table, evreid1, evreid2
hold keys from the resource table, etc. The
For what it's worth, the next release of PL/Java has support for both RECORD parameters and
SETOF RECORD return types. The adventurous can try out the current CVS HEAD.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
Tom Lane wrote:
Yl Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I want to implement a UDF that can accept a par
Can anyone tell me whether 7.3 supports unspecified record types or not?
On 1/24/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yl Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> Do you mean this function? Seems I cannot get much information from it...That would appear to be Postgres 7.3 :-(
You need a considerably ne
On Jan 24, 2006, at 7:47 AM, Vittorio wrote:
Yesterday, I upgraded freebsd from 5.4 to 6 via
the CD (the iso was downloaded from ftp.freebsd.org).
I've done this many times with no problems.
However.
You serve yourself very well by recompiling all your ports or
reinstalling the packag
Yl Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But I have to use 7.3 due to some limitations. Can I do it in 7.3?
Probably, but I forget how (and I can guarantee that it will break
when you do move to 8.0 or later, because we changed the internal
representation of rowtype arguments). You'd be *much* bette
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 14:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yl Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But I have to use 7.3 due to some limitations. Can I do it in 7.3?
>
> Probably, but I forget how (and I can guarantee that it will break
> when you do move to 8.0 or later, because we changed the internal
> rep
I have a postgresql 7.4.8 database which has the same table
declarations in several schemas. My application accesses each schema
from a single thread; there is never more than one thread accessing a
schema at a time.
To try increasing concurrency, I've tried using multiple threads per
schema. The
After a commit I receive this message:
"FATAL: invalid frontend message type 47", and rollback.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:50:39PM -0500, Sterpu Victor wrote:
> After a commit I receive this message:
> "FATAL: invalid frontend message type 47", and rollback.
The client seems to have violated the communications protocol. What
client interface are you using? What version of PostgreSQL (both
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Kovcs Pter wrote:
> Are indexes on VARCHAR columns used with the LIKE operator, and if so,
> how efficiently are they used?
>
> I can imagine that using indexes can be easy with the starting literal
> characters up to the first percent sign such as in:
>
Connections are through localhost. We've also connected via a client
machine through a router to insure it is not something on the server.
By drop connections, I mean Task Manager is showing additional
postgres.exe tasks after the completion of the test. Also, when we try
to drop the DB to res
I’ am looking for pgxml module for postgres 7.2.1, someone can help me
to find it?
Thanks
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
On 2006-01-24, Will Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might try:
>
> SELECT some_column
> FROM some_table
> GROUP BY some_column
> HAVING SUM(CASE WHEN sort_order=1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) = 0;
SELECT some_column
FROM some_table
GROUP BY some_column
HAVING every(sort_order <> 1);
every()
I'm having a problem converting a simple date routing to PLPGSQL. I
know the error has to be something stupid but I'm missing it. The error
is in the "ExpireDate := (date 'StartDate' + integer 'NumOfDays');" line
in the procedure below. I didn't understand why I had to convert the
date to a stri
On Jan 25, 2006, at 9:45 , Foster, Stephen wrote:
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type date: "StartDate"
CONTEXT: SQL statement "SELECT (date 'StartDate' + integer
'NumOfDays')"
PL/pgSQL function "TF_BannerAd_Ads_InsMod" line 8 at assignment
Why are you single-quoting StartDate and NumOfDa
Michael, I tried that line in the trigger procedure with double quotes,
single quotes and without. The only way it would save was with single
quotes and that is why you saw it that way. I know it has to be some
sort of stupid syntax error but since I'm new to PostgreSQL (as far as
this level of c
I'm running PostgreSQL 8.1 on CentOS 4.2, Dual proc Athlon 64 w/4 GB RAM.
I'm trying to get a PHP app to work, but the failure happens when the command
is copy/pasted into pgsql. Trying to run a large insert statement, and I get:
server closed the connection unexpectedly
This probably
On Jan 25, 2006, at 10:12 , Foster, Stephen wrote:
If I try to save without which was what I did in the first place I
receive this using "ExpireDate := (date StartDate + integer
NumOfDays);"
ERROR: syntax error at or near "$1" at character 16
QUERY: SELECT (date $1 + integer $2 )
CONT
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Foster, Stephen wrote:
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "TF_BannerAd_Ads_InsMod"()
> RETURNS "trigger" AS
> $BODY$
> DECLARE
> ExpireDate timestamptz; -- Date the Banner Ad will expire.
> StartDate char(10); -- Date the Banner Ad was created or
> renewed
>
Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> in /var/log/messages, I see
>
> Jan 24 17:00:04 kepler kernel: postmaster[26185]: segfault at
> 2516d728
> rip 0043c82c rsp 007fbfffddd0 error 4
>
> The insert statement is long, but doesn't seem to violate anything strange -
> n
Thanks guys it finally worked correctly. Just in case someone else get
hung on this type of thing here is the working trigger function.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "TF_BannerAd_Ads_InsMod"()
RETURNS "trigger" AS
$BODY$
DECLARE
ExpireDate timestamptz; -- Date the Banner Ad will expire.
BE
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Iâ am looking for pgxml module for postgres 7.2.1, someone can help me
> to find it?
*Please* tell me you are not still using PG 7.2.1.
There are seven subsequent releases in the 7.2 series, each containing
fixes for very serious bugs --- see
h
"Foster, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael, I tried that line in the trigger procedure with double quotes,
> single quotes and without. The only way it would save was with single
> quotes and that is why you saw it that way.
Just for reference, the thing that was tripping you up (or
Greg Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Janning Vygen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > one more question: You mentioned standard disk and memory checks. Can you
> > > point to some link where i can find more about it or which software do
> > > you
> > > mean? I guess i h
Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What information do you need to help figure this out?
Best is to provide a recipe by which someone else can reproduce it
from a standing start. You can find some useful hints at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/bug-reporting.html
The people who develop, package, and host pginstaller files are doing so
to promote open source software for users, not to help you sell
commercial software. For that, you are on your own.
If you want to find volunteers to help you promote and sell your
software, good luck. :-)
---
Thanks,
What's the best way to do this? Take PG down (normally started as a service)
and run directly in a single-user mode?
I've never reallly worked with gdb...
-Ben
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 17:27, you wrote:
> > What information do you need to help figure this out?
>
> Reproduce it
hello everybody
i am new to this mailing list. this is my first mail to this group.
i jussst want to confirm that whether is it possible to update a view or not??
i think you all help me in solving my queries in future...!!
--
Thanks & Regards,
Akhilesh
DAV Institute of Managem
AKHILESH GUPTA schrieb:
> hello everybody
> i am new to this mailing list. this is my first mail to this group.
> i jussst want to confirm that whether is it possible to update a view or
> not??
> i think you all help me in solving my queries in future...!!
Yes it is. All you have
93 matches
Mail list logo
