Hi,
well, i think the answer is simple 'it works' but i am not sure. When i
change the column type from int4 to int8, are the indexes still usable
or do i have to drop the indexes and create them again?
regards, David
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9
We would like to offer PostgreSql community, open source data
replication solution – Daffodil Replicator.
Daffodil Replicator is open source enterprise-wide data replication
solution that eliminates the complexity of sharing information among
heterogeneous operating systems and database
hello,
we have some webhosting servers and we can start postgresql support...
I need to create for one webhosting account one postgresql account,
which will have access only to databases created byh this postgresql
account.
I know, that it is no problem in mysql...
thanx, miso
--
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:47:30AM +0100, David Teran wrote:
> well, i think the answer is simple 'it works' but i am not sure. When i
> change the column type from int4 to int8, are the indexes still usable
> or do i have to drop the indexes and create them again?
What happened when you tried
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:08:51AM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:47:30AM +0100, David Teran wrote:
>
> > well, i think the answer is simple 'it works' but i am not sure. When i
> > change the column type from int4 to int8, are the indexes still usable
> > or do i have t
> We're getting about 64 million rows inserted in about 1.5 hrs into a
> table with a multiple-column primary key - that's the only index.
> That's seems pretty good to me - SQL Loader takes about 4 hrs to do the
> same job.
As I recall, the last time we rebuilt our database, it took about 3 hours
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wes
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 8:59 AM
To: Guy Rouillier; pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Greer, Doug [NTK]
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] hundreds of millions row dBs
> We're getting about 64 million rows inser
Wes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I recall, the last time we rebuilt our database, it took about 3 hours to
> import 265 million rows of data. It then took another 16 hours to rebuild
> all the indexes.
Out of curiosity, what value of sort_mem were you using?
(In PG 8.0, the sort memory setti
"Dann Corbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is an instance where a really big ram disk might be handy.
> You could create a database on a big ram disk and load it, then build
> the indexes.
> Then shut down the database and move it to hard disk.
Actually, if you have a RAM disk, just change t
I've got a server running PostgreSQL-7.2.3 on RHAS-2.1. The version
of Postgresql is *not* my choice, I would have gone with something
much more current, but i digress.
Running 'vacuumdb -a -z -v -f' has started failing:
NOTICE: Index pg_toast_218644531_idx: Pages 1; Tuples 0.
CPU 0.00s
RC3 on Microsoft VirtualPC with Debian Testing passes all tests.
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
We're always looking to improve that list, so we encourage anyone that
is running a platform not listed to please report on any success or
failures with Release Candidate 3.
Running a fresh install of Debian/
Lonni J Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ERROR: No one parent tuple was found
> Anyone have any suggestions on how to correct this?
Shut down whatever long-running transaction is hanging around in the
background. You wouldn't be getting this error if vacuum weren't
trying to move a chain
To speed up load :
- make less checkpoints (tweak checkpoint interval and other parameters
in config)
- disable fsync (not sure if it really helps)
- have source data, database tables, and log on three physically
different disks
- have the temporary on a different disk too, or in ramdisk
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:30:43 -0500, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lonni J Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ERROR: No one parent tuple was found
>
> > Anyone have any suggestions on how to correct this?
>
> Shut down whatever long-running transaction is hanging around in the
> bac
Hi all,
I am doing experiments on a new operator I am writing as a C shared
library function.
1) As part of the experimentation I need to know exactly how many blocks
have been read/write when
the algorithm ran. I need complete control over the process to run my
simulations.
I see that there are
Are there any differences between text and varchar? I found the following in
the docs, which leads me to believe that there are no differences at all.
Can someone please confirm this before I switch all my varchars to text?
Tip: There are no performance differences between these three types, apart
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:43:20AM +0100, Thierry Missimilly wrote:
>
> I have spend some time to read the very interesting feature LISTEN /
> NOTIFY. I have found a lot of documentation on how to use in psql but
> nothing on how to use in Perl DBI program. I don't know if it works.
> I'll be ve
17 matches
Mail list logo