Hi all,
Comments inline
- Original Message -
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Travers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Is my MySQL Gaining ?
> On
Martin Marques (Friday 26 December 2003 14:11)
> Windows native port might be out in the next release (name it 7.5 or 8.0),
> with many other things there, and it should be out by fall of next year,
> which is much earlier then 2 years. :-)
Great. But I really don't see how this makes the DBMS an
Regardless of the reasons, perception is reality. If we appear to be
disheveled then we are.
I would think that it should be possible to give the appearance of unity
without actually requiring a full time web-master?
Dave
On Fri, 2003-12-26 at 12:43, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Dec 200
Jan Wieck (Friday 26 December 2003 10:02)
> The strategy of misguiding people like "you don't need foreign keys", "you
> don't need stored procedures", "yadda yadda triggers", "blah blah views"
> didn't work forever.
PRECISELY my point! But so many ignorant users fall for this and babble on
sayi
Chris Travers (Saturday 27 December 2003 06:44)
> In short, I do not see MySQL as any sort of threat to PostgreSQL, near or
> long-term. PostgreSQL will continue when MySQL no longer exists. Firebird
> is a more serious competitor long-term, though I found it to be hard to
> learn when compared t
Mike Nolan (Friday 26 December 2003 16:02)
> Sometimes books are still better than online docs. :-)
No, the online docs simply need an index with links :-). If I could look at a
complete index and quickly find BETWEEN in the B's with links to applicable
sections, I would have no other wish of
