On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:40:13PM +0200, Alexander Staubo wrote:
> On 6/1/07, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >These are all different solutions to different problems, so it's not
> >surprising that they look different. This was the reason I asked,
> >"What is the problem you are try
On 6/1/07, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These are all different solutions to different problems, so it's not
surprising that they look different. This was the reason I asked,
"What is the problem you are trying to solve?"
You mean aside from the obvious one, scalability?
The dat
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:39:42PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ever need? I say yes, I can. BUT it would so much cooler IF,
> there was a multi-master environment configured for the sake of
> doing it.
Yes, it would be. Unfortunately, when I was in the position where I
had to explain to
Let me clarify - I don't know how/where the thought is that I need
something per se, I personally like deploying the scaled solutions and
playing with software that others have written. Can I deploy the right
hardware and configurations to meet pretty much near anything anyone could
ever need?
As an aside -- please don't start new topics in old threads.
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:42:02AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm disappointed because SLONY-II has not been released yet to support
> multi-master replication!
Well, I wouldn't hold my breath. Most of the participants in
