I wrote:
> We've poked a few loopholes in the strong typing over the years
> --- the whole business of EXECUTE versus direct evaluation of a
> query can be seen as allowing weak typing for EXECUTE'd queries.
> But it's still the language's design center.
Rereading that, it suddenly struck me that
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is clear what is at least one of the advantage of plpython or
> plperl over plpgsql, but then what are the advantages of plpgsql over
> the rest of the crowd other than resembling the language used in
> Oracle?
Others made some other comments
On May 10, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 07:35:36 +0200
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
your application different execution paths. Generally I can say, so
plpgsql isn't well language for this games, and better is using
plperl, plpython or othe
Hello
2008/5/10 Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 10 May 2008 07:35:36 +0200
> "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> your application different execution paths. Generally I can say, so
>> plpgsql isn't well language for this games, and better is using
>> plperl, plpyth
