On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 09:25 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > I know. But it would be a chance to remind people to upgrade their
> > installations.
>
> An arbitrary listing won't do that.
Depends.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com
devrim~gunduz.org, devr
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 18:50 +0200, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 08:44 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > Is it possible to add all (7.3+) versions to versions.rss, but show
> > only
> > > top 5 versions?
> >
> > 7.3 is not supported.
>
> I know. But it would be a chance to remin
2010/1/29 Devrim GÜNDÜZ :
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:08 +, Dave Page wrote:
>> > Perhaps because you only display five releases in the "Latest
>> Releases"
>> > part of the front page? which means 8.0 to 8.4.
>>
>> Yes. iirc, that was the reason.
>
> Is it possible to add all (7.3+) versions to
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 08:44 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Is it possible to add all (7.3+) versions to versions.rss, but show
> only
> > top 5 versions?
>
> 7.3 is not supported.
I know. But it would be a chance to remind people to upgrade their
installations.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
Command
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 17:49 +0200, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:08 +, Dave Page wrote:
> > > Perhaps because you only display five releases in the "Latest
> > Releases"
> > > part of the front page? which means 8.0 to 8.4.
> >
> > Yes. iirc, that was the reason.
>
> Is it
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:08 +, Dave Page wrote:
> > Perhaps because you only display five releases in the "Latest
> Releases"
> > part of the front page? which means 8.0 to 8.4.
>
> Yes. iirc, that was the reason.
Is it possible to add all (7.3+) versions to versions.rss, but show only
top 5
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> Le 29/01/2010 15:51, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
>> (adding pgsql-www, isn't this more a www question than a general
>> postgresql usage question?)
>>
>>
>> 2010/1/29 Greg Sabino Mullane :
>>>
>>>
>>> While looking into a failed check_postg
Le 29/01/2010 15:51, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> (adding pgsql-www, isn't this more a www question than a general
> postgresql usage question?)
>
>
> 2010/1/29 Greg Sabino Mullane :
>>
>>
>> While looking into a failed check_postgres check, I found a problem
>> with the canonical versions page he
