On 08/07/2012 08:36 PM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
On Tuesday 07 Aug 2012 12:21:04 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Shridhar Daithankar writes:
> > I am wondering, why following two values result in a shift by 3.5
hours. I
> > would expect them to be identical.
> >
> > I understand that canonical ti
On Tuesday 07 Aug 2012 12:21:04 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Shridhar Daithankar writes:
> > I am wondering, why following two values result in a shift by 3.5 hours. I
> > would expect them to be identical.
> >
> > I understand that canonical time zone names could be ambiguous at times
> > but I think IS
Shridhar Daithankar writes:
> I am wondering, why following two values result in a shift by 3.5 hours. I
> would expect them to be identical.
> I understand that canonical time zone names could be ambiguous at times but I
> think IST is not one of them.
I don't know why you'd think that ...
sr
