Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con

2017-10-30 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:08 PM, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:48 AM, rakeshkumar464 > wrote: >> >> I would prefer using postgresql.conf. what is the consensus in this forum >> regarding command line vs postgresql.conf. > > I suspect that most people administering a Postgr

Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con

2017-10-30 Thread David G. Johnston
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:48 AM, rakeshkumar464 wrote: > I would prefer using postgresql.conf. what is the consensus in this forum > regarding command line vs postgresql.conf. ​I suspect that most people administering a PostgreSQL database would expect that the configuration file would be chan

Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con

2017-10-30 Thread Tom Lane
rakeshkumar464 writes: > I am new to Docker env and I see that PG, as a container is started with > [ lots of command-line parameters ] > I would prefer using postgresql.conf. what is the consensus in this forum > regarding command line vs postgresql.conf. Also if conflicting, which one > takes