Re: [GENERAL] slony issues.

2009-11-07 Thread Jeff Davis
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 11:59 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote: > Thanks I'll take a look. I'm afraid that I might not get much out of > it if the cost is hidden by the function. But it's a start. You should be able to get the cost of any SPI executed in the function by using auto_explain.log_nested_sta

Re: [GENERAL] slony issues.

2009-11-07 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 09:23 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote: >> I already asked this basic question on the slony mailing lists, but >> they seem kinda quiet this week. >> >> So, I've got a database with about 30,000 objects in it, and running >> the

Re: [GENERAL] slony issues.

2009-11-07 Thread Jeff Davis
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 09:23 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote: > I already asked this basic question on the slony mailing lists, but > they seem kinda quiet this week. > > So, I've got a database with about 30,000 objects in it, and running > the setaddtable() function is taking about 30 seconds, and spi