On 16/10/2009 20:38, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
> Does "PG" = PostgreSQL? If so, it can do LDAP, Kerberos and PAM, among
> other things:
Apologies for the noise - I thought I was replying to a non-PG list. :-)
Ray.
--
Raymond O'Donnel
2009/10/17 Tom Lane :
> If you decide to go with this approach and use PAM as intermediary,
> you'll need the patch I just committed in response to bug #5121 --- it
> turns out nobody had ever tried that with Postgres before :-(. But
> I think it's also possible to just use PG's native Kerberos su
"Scot Kreienkamp" writes:
> On 16/10/2009 19:38, Scot Kreienkamp wrote:
>> ... We are a largely Windows shop with many app and
>> database servers running Linux. The Linux environment is growing too
>> large not to do centralized authentication of some kind.
> So I guess what I see taking sha
On 16/10/2009 19:38, Scot Kreienkamp wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
>
>
> I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never
> setup a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question is,
> what do most people do for centralized command line, X, and PG
> authentication?
On 16/10/2009 19:38, Scot Kreienkamp wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
>
>
> I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never
> setup a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question
is,
> what do most people do for centralized command line, X, and PG
> authentication?
From: Scott Mead [mailto:scott.li...@enterprisedb.com]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 2:50 PM
To: Scot Kreienkamp
Cc: pgsql-general
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] slightly off-topic: Central Auth
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Scot Kreienkamp
wrote:
Hey everyone,
I apologize in advance for
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Scot Kreienkamp wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
>
>
> I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never setup
> a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question is, what do
> most people do for centralized command line, X, and PG authenti
