Point taken, thanx,
however from the docs, it is far from explicit that setting
session_replication_role to 'replica'
can disable FK constraints (RI) and finally result in an incosistent database.
It might be that RI in postgres is implemented via triggers, but to the user,
that is just an implem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
manos tsahakis wrote:
> In our application we are enabling session_replication_role TO 'replica' in
> certain situations so that triggers will not fire in a table during DML
> operations. However, we observed that when setting session_replicatio
On Tuesday 15 April 2008 14:26, Chris Browne wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Lee Tucker) writes:
> > Is there a distinction between "ORIGIN" and "LOCAL" as related to
> > session_replication_role, and if so, what is it? I am unable to
> > understand from the documentation any distinction between
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Lee Tucker) writes:
> Is there a distinction between "ORIGIN" and "LOCAL" as related to
> session_replication_role, and if so, what is it? I am unable to understand
> from the documentation any distinction between the two settings.
The intent is that a system that is the
