On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 04:24:32 PM Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 12:41 PM, Geoffrey Myers wrote:
> > Am I correct in assuming that the 'running out of oids' issue was
> > resolved with a design change within Postgresql?
>
> Yes, many, many, many years ago. The only way to encounter
On 08/03/2011 12:41 PM, Geoffrey Myers wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that the 'running out of oids' issue was
resolved with a design change within Postgresql?
Yes, many, many, many years ago. The only way to encounter the problem
now is through user error, e.g; don't use WITH OIDS when creat
Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Geoffrey Myers
wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that the 'running out of oids' issue was resolved
with a design change within Postgresql?
not exactly -- for quite some time now the use of oids in user tables
has been discouraged. The right
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Geoffrey Myers
wrote:
> Am I correct in assuming that the 'running out of oids' issue was resolved
> with a design change within Postgresql?
not exactly -- for quite some time now the use of oids in user tables
has been discouraged. The right way to deal with this
