Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
My understanding is that 8.1 will have a much more mature
implementation of
stored procedures versus UDFs (Which we have had forever).
What's the difference between UDF and stored procedure ?
Here are a couple of GGIYF references:
Oleg Bartunov writes:
> Hmm, the only real difference I see - is that SP are precompiled.
> I think we should clearly outline what is SP and what is UDF and do we
> are working on SP or just improving and extending our functions.
AFAIR, the only person who's actually stated any intention to work
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
My understanding is that 8.1 will have a much more mature implementation
of
stored procedures versus UDFs (Which we have had forever).
What's the difference between UDF and stored procedure ?
Here are a couple of GGIYF references:
http://builder.com.c
My understanding is that 8.1 will have a much more mature
implementation of
stored procedures versus UDFs (Which we have had forever).
What's the difference between UDF and stored procedure ?
Here are a couple of GGIYF references:
http://builder.com.com/5100-6388-1045463.html
http://blogs.pingp
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tony Caduto wrote:
Hi,
I read in a article/interview on
http://madpenguin.org/cms/html/62/3677.html
that work was being done on improving/adding support for sql standard
compliant stored proc
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tony Caduto wrote:
Hi,
I read in a article/interview on
http://madpenguin.org/cms/html/62/3677.html
that work was being done on improving/adding support for sql standard
compliant stored procs/functions
Does anyone know exactly what t
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tony Caduto wrote:
Hi,
I read in a article/interview on http://madpenguin.org/cms/html/62/3677.html
that work was being done on improving/adding support for sql standard
compliant stored procs/functions
Does anyone know exactly what that means?
Does it mean
Tony Caduto wrote:
> Hi,
> I read in a article/interview on http://madpenguin.org/cms/html/62/3677.html
> that work was being done on improving/adding support for sql standard
> compliant stored procs/functions
>
> Does anyone know exactly what that means?
>
> Does it mean that Postgres will hav
