At 12:41 PM -0400 9/5/07, Owen Hartnett wrote:
At 11:32 AM -0400 9/5/07, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Owen Hartnett wrote:
I've been able to turn on statement logging (I've set log_statement to
'all'), but it doesn't seem to show the begin transaction - commit
At 11:32 AM -0400 9/5/07, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Owen Hartnett wrote:
I've been able to turn on statement logging (I've set log_statement to
'all'), but it doesn't seem to show the begin transaction - commit -
rollback statements. Is there another way to
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> In PG 8.2 I'd agree, but older versions are not so good about logging
>> execution of prepared statements. What's the server version exactly,
>> and is there any indication of use of prepared statements in the log?
> Humm, but can yo
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Owen Hartnett wrote:
> >> I've been able to turn on statement logging (I've set log_statement to
> >> 'all'), but it doesn't seem to show the begin transaction - commit -
> >> rollback statements. Is there another way to have them
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Owen Hartnett wrote:
>> I've been able to turn on statement logging (I've set log_statement to
>> 'all'), but it doesn't seem to show the begin transaction - commit -
>> rollback statements. Is there another way to have them show up in the log?
> If
Owen Hartnett wrote:
> At 10:14 AM -0400 8/28/07, Owen Hartnett wrote:
>> At 7:05 PM -0400 8/27/07, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Owen Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I assign the transaction object to each of the commands, but it seems
that some tables will get updated, even when I call rol
At 10:14 AM -0400 8/28/07, Owen Hartnett wrote:
At 7:05 PM -0400 8/27/07, Tom Lane wrote:
Owen Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I assign the transaction object to each of the commands, but it seems
that some tables will get updated, even when I call rollback. Is
something I'm calling se
At 7:05 PM -0400 8/27/07, Tom Lane wrote:
Owen Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I assign the transaction object to each of the commands, but it seems
that some tables will get updated, even when I call rollback. Is
something I'm calling secretly calling "commit" somewhere?
Dunno anythi
Owen Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I assign the transaction object to each of the commands, but it seems
> that some tables will get updated, even when I call rollback. Is
> something I'm calling secretly calling "commit" somewhere?
Dunno anything about vb.net, but this sounds like an
