At 7:51 PM -0500 11/7/08, Tom Allison wrote:
adam_pgsql wrote:
When I do the install script in contrib it says I have no rights
to the directory. It was in /usr/local/pgsql/data/log and I
changed it to /usr/local/pgsql/log. It was set as root.wheel with
755 permissions so I suspect it's mad
adam_pgsql wrote:
When I do the install script in contrib it says I have no rights to
the directory. It was in /usr/local/pgsql/data/log and I changed it
to /usr/local/pgsql/log. It was set as root.wheel with 755
permissions so I suspect it's mad at me because the postgres user was
left in t
Tom Allison wrote:
It confirms what I'm working through.
crt1.o located at /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk/usr/lib/crt1.o
crt1.10.5.0 at /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk/usr/lib/crt1.10.5.o
So I'm trying to find how to get these directories included in the
compilation. I thought --with-libs and
When I do the install script in contrib it says I have no rights to
the directory. It was in /usr/local/pgsql/data/log and I changed it
to /usr/local/pgsql/log. It was set as root.wheel with 755
permissions so I suspect it's mad at me because the postgres user
was left in the cold.
Have
Tom Allison wrote:
Scott Ribe wrote:
'make' is prefixed by /Developer/usr/bin/.
The question is *why* the location is nonstandard.
Starting with Xcode 3, all the developer tools get installed under the
Developer directory, in order to allow one to easily have multiple
versions
of Xcode inst
Scott Ribe wrote:
'make' is prefixed by /Developer/usr/bin/.
The question is *why* the location is nonstandard.
Starting with Xcode 3, all the developer tools get installed under the
Developer directory, in order to allow one to easily have multiple versions
of Xcode installed alongside each o
>> 'make' is prefixed by /Developer/usr/bin/.
>
> The question is *why* the location is nonstandard.
Starting with Xcode 3, all the developer tools get installed under the
Developer directory, in order to allow one to easily have multiple versions
of Xcode installed alongside each other. The ques
Tom Lane wrote:
Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I tried getting a source install on my mac book yesterday and today.
It's not a normal *nix installation. The location of the files are all
non-standard.
'make' is prefixed by /Developer/usr/bin/.
The question is *why* the location is no
On Nov 4, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I tried getting a source install on my mac book yesterday and today.
It's not a normal *nix installation. The location of the files are
all
non-standard.
'make' is prefixed by /Developer/usr/bin/.
The que
On Nov 4, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Tom Allison wrote:
I tried getting a source install on my mac book yesterday and today.
It's not a normal *nix installation. The location of the files
are all
non-standard.
'make' is prefixed by /Developer/usr/bin/.
It's in /usr/bin/make on my OS X box (as well
Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried getting a source install on my mac book yesterday and today.
> It's not a normal *nix installation. The location of the files are all
> non-standard.
> 'make' is prefixed by /Developer/usr/bin/.
The question is *why* the location is nonstandard.
Francisco Figueiredo Jr. wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
I feel good about control here, and I certainly don't have any problems.
So, please don't whine :)
Especially since I want to run cvs head, and be able to actually u
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>>
>> I feel good about control here, and I certainly don't have any problems.
>> So, please don't whine :)
>> Especially since I want to run cvs head, and be able to actually update it
>> from cvs w
On 4 nov 2008, at 11.21, Tom Allison wrote:
I tried getting a source install on my mac book yesterday and today.
It's not a normal *nix installation. The location of the files are
all non-standard.
'make' is prefixed by /Developer/usr/bin/.
That's not right. It should definately live in /
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
I feel good about control here, and I certainly don't have any problems.
So, please don't whine :)
Especially since I want to run cvs head, and be able to actually update
it from cvs when I want to, that's the only choice. Postgresql is so
easy to get from sources, co
I feel good about control here, and I certainly don't have any problems. So,
please don't whine :) Especially since I want to run cvs head, and be able
to actually update it from cvs when I want to, that's the only choice.
Postgresql is so easy to get from sources, compared to other software
packag
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
I use postgresql on MBP, current head, for testing and development. Just
from sources, it won't bite :)
you just have to add user postgres to your system, place $PGDATA
wherever you feel you should, and you're done.
Yes. I actually started using Nix from Slackwa
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was using macports but got into a cluster-F on versions and multiple
> installs. After a spell I had all four versions 8.0 - 8.3 installed in
> order to use postgres, ruby, perl, and rails together.
I use apple's ruby, b
I use postgresql on MBP, current head, for testing and development. Just
from sources, it won't bite :)
you just have to add user postgres to your system, place $PGDATA wherever
you feel you should, and you're done.
On 28 okt 2008, at 23.41, Tom Allison wrote:
I can get postgresql installed in three flavors:
EnterpriseDB has a dmg package for Mac.
macports has their own package.
fink also has their own package.
You also have the fourth, most delicious flavor: build it yourself;
PostgreSQL compiles nicel
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>>
>> Installing from source means I can avoid the fragility of macports or
>> fink, and know that I've built it in much the same way as the postgresql or
>> solaris installat
Niklas Johansson wrote:
On 28 okt 2008, at 23.41, Tom Allison wrote:
I was using macports but got into a cluster-F on versions and multiple
installs. After a spell I had all four versions 8.0 - 8.3 installed
in order to use postgres, ruby, perl, and rails together.
Do you mean that Macports
On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
Installing from source means I can avoid the fragility of macports
or fink, and know that I've built it in much the same way as the
postgresql or solaris installation I'd be using for production.
+1
It means I can easily pick the contrib mod
On 28 okt 2008, at 23.41, Tom Allison wrote:
I can get postgresql installed in three flavors:
EnterpriseDB has a dmg package for Mac.
macports has their own package.
fink also has their own package.
You also have the fourth, most delicious flavor: build it yourself;
PostgreSQL compiles nicel
On Oct 28, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Tom Allison wrote:
Relatively simple question that I hope doesn't start too much "Flame".
I have recently had the opportunity to reformat my macbook hard
drive, many thanks to suggestions from the actual Apple support
team. That's not why I'm writing to the po
25 matches
Mail list logo
