Doc patch applied. I must have missed the second attachment.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Actually, the docs *were* submitted. See
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, the docs *were* submitted. See
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/msg00375.php.
> Applied per
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-03/msg00080.php, I
> think it's just the docs that were missed.
Ah. I had
> > > 8.2 will have direct LDAP authentication without PAM.
> >
> > That code's going to go away real soon if some
> documentation doesn't
> > show up. I can't believe Bruce was sloppy enough to accept
> a feature
> > patch with zero documentation.
>
> ?? I thought I had sent in the docs for
> > 8.2 will have direct LDAP authentication without PAM.
>
> That code's going to go away real soon if some documentation
> doesn't show up. I can't believe Bruce was sloppy enough to
> accept a feature patch with zero documentation.
?? I thought I had sent in the docs for that. Will dig thro
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 8.2 will have direct LDAP authentication without PAM.
That code's going to go away real soon if some documentation doesn't
show up. I can't believe Bruce was sloppy enough to accept a feature
patch with zero documentation.
r
> Hi
>
> I have started to use ldap for user authentication on my systems.
>
> 1 is it possible to get postgres to authenticate against ldap
Yes. With current releases you can do this with PAM, assuming you're on
a platform that can do PAM. If your platform can't do PAM (for example,
Windows), y
