Re: [GENERAL] pgavd status

2005-06-17 Thread Chris Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Brandon Metcalf") writes: > I've been looking at the auto vacuum daemon pgavd and it looks like > there hasn't been any development activity in a while. Does anyone > know that status of pgavd? The pgavd "tarball" has not been touched since September 2002. http://cvsup.de.op

Re: [GENERAL] pgavd status

2005-06-16 Thread Douglas McNaught
"Matthew T. O'Connor" writes: > There has been extensive conversation in the last few days, however I > think Brandon is referencing pgavd which is a project on gborg, which > was an autovacuum implementation started by someone else that never > took off. This is totally separate from pg_autovac

Re: [GENERAL] pgavd status

2005-06-16 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Douglas McNaught wrote: "Brandon Metcalf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I've been looking at the auto vacuum daemon pgavd and it looks like there hasn't been any development activity in a while. Does anyone know that status of pgavd? Also, I'd be interested in hearing how well it works and

Re: [GENERAL] pgavd status

2005-06-16 Thread Brandon Metcalf
d == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: d> "Brandon Metcalf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: d> > I've been looking at the auto vacuum daemon pgavd and it looks like d> > there hasn't been any development activity in a while. Does anyone d> > know that status of pgavd? d> > d> > Also, I'd be interested

Re: [GENERAL] pgavd status

2005-06-16 Thread Douglas McNaught
"Brandon Metcalf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've been looking at the auto vacuum daemon pgavd and it looks like > there hasn't been any development activity in a while. Does anyone > know that status of pgavd? > > Also, I'd be interested in hearing how well it works and if there are > any pla