If you haven't seen it already, there is a rails plugin that adds
support for foreign-key dependencies (among other things) to the
migration domain specific language (DSL):
http://www.redhillonrails.org/#foreign_key_migrations
Another useful plug-in is "Transactional Migrations" which
automatical
On Aug 6, 2007, at 13:17 , Perry Smith wrote:
I'm using config.active_record.schema_format = :sql. I like the
idea of constraints in the db -- I know that goes against a lot of
rails ideas.
I think most who choose Postgres come to the same conclusion. Though
do take care not to confuse R
On Aug 5, 2007, at 18:58 , Perry Smith wrote:
I find it odd that you are resistant to the idea. To me, the
advantages are clear if it can be done without a tremendous amount
of work. Why horse around with the environment variables to set
such things as password, call sh, just to call pg_d
On Aug 5, 2007, at 7:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
PS: *please* see if you can get them to take out the usage of
pg_dump's
-i switch. Having code invoke that blindly borders on criminal
negligence.
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/9198
Thank you again.
Take care,
Perry Smith ( [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 5, 2007, at 7:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I find it odd that you are resistant to the idea. To me, the
advantages are clear if it can be done without a tremendous amount of
work.
Well, it can't. pg_dump is an enormously complicated and frequently
ch
Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I find it odd that you are resistant to the idea. To me, the
> advantages are clear if it can be done without a tremendous amount of
> work.
Well, it can't. pg_dump is an enormously complicated and frequently
changed bit of code, and so you really re
On Aug 5, 2007, at 6:07 PM, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Aug 5, 2007, at 16:31 , Perry Smith wrote:
I'm trying to help out the rails people. Currently they have
"rake" scripts which call pg_dump, dropdb, createdb, and psql. It
would be nicer if this could be done via a database connectio
On Aug 5, 2007, at 16:31 , Perry Smith wrote:
I'm trying to help out the rails people. Currently they have
"rake" scripts which call pg_dump, dropdb, createdb, and psql. It
would be nicer if this could be done via a database connection.
Why would this be nicer? What's the advantage? pg_d
