Tom Lane wrote:
> Frank van Vugt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Did I miss this future necessity on the TODO-list ('cause I did check...) or
> > is it simply not on there (yet) ?
>
> It's not there; it should be. Something like
>
> * Need better (safer, less prone to unnecessary failures) sche
Frank van Vugt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did I miss this future necessity on the TODO-list ('cause I did check...) or
> is it simply not on there (yet) ?
It's not there; it should be. Something like
* Need better (safer, less prone to unnecessary failures) scheme for
ensuring CREATE DATAB
Hi,
Thanks Bruce ;-)
Tom Lane wrote:
> Sooner or later we'll have to face up to the conflict
Thanks Tom, I understand what's happening now.
Did I miss this future necessity on the TODO-list ('cause I did check...) or
is it simply not on there (yet) ?
I'm just being inquisitive, I understand