El 24/08/15 a las 15:41, Florin Andrei escribió:
> On 2015-08-23 06:56, Martín Marqués wrote:
>> El 21/08/15 a las 20:45, Florin Andrei escribió:
>>>
>>> The single instance scheme is not very reliable. I need to build a new
>>> DB backend. I'll set up Postgres 9.4. Ideally, I'd like to setup 2
>>>
On 2015-08-22 03:05, Chris Mair wrote:
a few keywords in your mail hint at the fact you're using AWS?
If that's the case, you might want to look into their managed
PostgreSQL hosting: it's called Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL and
supports failover ("Multi AZ") and master-slave replication
("Read Re
On 2015-08-23 06:56, Martín Marqués wrote:
El 21/08/15 a las 20:45, Florin Andrei escribió:
The single instance scheme is not very reliable. I need to build a new
DB backend. I'll set up Postgres 9.4. Ideally, I'd like to setup 2
instances, each instance placed in a different availability zone.
El 21/08/15 a las 20:45, Florin Andrei escribió:
>
> The single instance scheme is not very reliable. I need to build a new
> DB backend. I'll set up Postgres 9.4. Ideally, I'd like to setup 2
> instances, each instance placed in a different availability zone.
> Master/master replication. I'll put
> I see there are many different ways to build a PG cluster. What would be
> the best choice in my case?
Hi,
a few keywords in your mail hint at the fact you're using AWS?
If that's the case, you might want to look into their managed
PostgreSQL hosting: it's called Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL and
