Ok , i do see there is already the handling of application_name in the
trigger ,
this is quite sufficient for my current needs.
regds
mallah.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Rajesh Mallah
wrote:
> Hi Scott / List ,
>
> Thanks for the response,
>
> the application_name usage seems to be more
Hi Scott / List ,
Thanks for the response,
the application_name usage seems to be more natural as it is something
inbuilt.
the audit trigger repo seems to have got update only in past 2 years .
are there other more active projects doing the same thing ?
in my opinion (which may be flawed) pgaud
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Rajesh Mallah
wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I am referring to audit trigger as described in
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Audit_trigger_91plus OR
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Audit_trigger
>
> Although there are documented limitations for these systems , but
> I
