Re: [GENERAL] interval integer comparison

2005-06-02 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 13:26:32 +0200, Havasvölgyi Ottó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I tried to simulate this unexpected result, but with no success. Here in > Hungary we had daylight saving this year on the 27th of March > (http://webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/b.html). So I tried these: >

Re: [GENERAL] interval integer comparison

2005-06-02 Thread Havasvölgyi Ottó
Hi, - Original Message - From: "Bruno Wolff III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:53 AM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] interval integer comparison > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:54:12 +0200, >

Re: [GENERAL] interval integer comparison

2005-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:54:12 +0200, Havasvölgyi Ottó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you Tom. > > It was a bit confusing because my WHERE clause looked something like this: > > ... WHERE date_field - current_date < '21 days'::interval; > > And then I got records, whose with date_field's

Re: [GENERAL] interval integer comparison

2005-06-01 Thread Havasvölgyi Ottó
rrent_date + '21 days'::interval; Best Regards, Otto - Original Message - From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:46 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] interval integer compari

Re: [GENERAL] interval integer comparison

2005-05-31 Thread Tom Lane
=?iso-8859-2?Q?Havasv=F6lgyi_Ott=F3?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Pg 8.0.3 allows me to compare interval with integer, but I cannot see any > reasonable rule: > 1 < '1 days'::interval The reason that doesn't fail outright is that both integer and interval have implicit coercions to text. So th