On 07/11/2016 01:00 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Adrian Klaver
wrote:
On 07/10/2016 03:13 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
My box upgraded postgresql from 9.4.8 to 9.5.3 when doing a full
version upgrade (Fedora 23 --> 24).
I have now :
/db/pgsal/data > initialize
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 07/10/2016 03:13 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> My box upgraded postgresql from 9.4.8 to 9.5.3 when doing a full
>> version upgrade (Fedora 23 --> 24).
>>
>> I have now :
>>
>> /db/pgsal/data > initialized with 9.5, with postgresql.co
On 07/10/2016 03:13 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
My box upgraded postgresql from 9.4.8 to 9.5.3 when doing a full
version upgrade (Fedora 23 --> 24).
I have now :
/db/pgsal/data > initialized with 9.5, with postgresql.conf and
pg_hab.conf from 9.4
/db/pgsql/data.old > the old one from 9.4
arnaud gaboury writes:
> Ok. With the data from my 9-4, i.e /db/pgsql/data, and with
> postgresql.service stopped.
> # postgresql-setup --upgrade
> * Upgrading database.
> ERROR: pg_upgrade tool failed
> ERROR: Upgrade failed.
> * See /var/lib/pgsql/upgrade_postgresql.log for details.
> # cat
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> arnaud gaboury writes:
>> My box upgraded postgresql from 9.4.8 to 9.5.3 when doing a full
>> version upgrade (Fedora 23 --> 24).
>
> So I assume you're using the Fedora-supplied RPMs, not the PGDG ones?
>
> (I'm not real sure, but I think the up
arnaud gaboury writes:
> My box upgraded postgresql from 9.4.8 to 9.5.3 when doing a full
> version upgrade (Fedora 23 --> 24).
So I assume you're using the Fedora-supplied RPMs, not the PGDG ones?
(I'm not real sure, but I think the upgrade process would not have
chosen to replace non-Fedora RP
