On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:13:15 -0500
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Of course we would still need to add an EOL page... I think one
> > could make a strong argument for a static url for EOL info now
> > that windows is EOL for < 8.2.
>
> You coul
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course we would still need to add an EOL page... I think one could make a
> strong argument for a static url for EOL info now that windows is EOL for <
> 8.2.
You could make a strong argument for a page stating that versions
thus-and-so are *already
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:15:23 -0300
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> >
> > > Is it just vaporware... maybe... but still there are pros and
> > > cons of having a bland schedule for EOL and new releases.
> >
> > We do h
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 15:48, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:15:23 -0300
>
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> > > Is it just vaporware... maybe... but still there are pros and
> > > cons of having a bland schedule for EOL and n
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:15:23 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
>
> > Is it just vaporware... maybe... but still there are pros and
> > cons of having a bland schedule for EOL and new releases.
>
> We do have a schedule:
> http://developer.postgresql.o
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> Is it just vaporware... maybe... but still there are pros and cons of
> having a bland schedule for EOL and new releases.
We do have a schedule:
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/PostgreSQL_8.4_Development_Plan
--
Alvaro Herrera
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:19:19 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:44:30AM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
> wrote:
> > That's why I wrote "without making it too formal" and "bland
> > commitment to the release schedule...".
> The problem with doing it that w
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:44:30AM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
>
> That's why I wrote "without making it too formal" and "bland
> commitment to the release schedule...".
The problem with doing it that way is that, when the release fails to meet
the original target deadline, any coverage o
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:53:06 -0600
Decibel! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with that is that as a volunteer-run project, dates
> can be off by a mile. Less than a year ago the plan was to release
> 8.3 is August-September 2007. Instead it was released a week or two
> ago.
That's why I w
On Feb 11, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:36:21 +0100
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.postgresql.org/support/security
that's probably the best one you can find. Or that in combination
with the news archive (http://www.postgresql.org/a
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:36:21 +0100
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.postgresql.org/support/security
>
> that's probably the best one you can find. Or that in combination
> with the news archive (http://www.postgresql.org/about/newsarchive)
Really... without making it too
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:26:39PM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:46:00 -0500
> "Christopher Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 11, 2008 8:04 AM, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I did manage to find an announcement about the sup
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 08:46:00AM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2008 8:04 AM, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I did manage to find an announcement about the support of pg for
> > windows... but I wasn't able to see anything you'd have a summary of
> > scheduled
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:46:00 -0500
"Christopher Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2008 8:04 AM, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I did manage to find an announcement about the support of pg for
> > windows... but I wasn't able to see anything you'd have a summar
On Feb 11, 2008 8:04 AM, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did manage to find an announcement about the support of pg for
> windows... but I wasn't able to see anything you'd have a summary of
> scheduled and planned EOL for various pg versions (on different
> platform).
There h
15 matches
Mail list logo
