On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:35:33AM +0900, Craig Ringer wrote:
> BTW, I'm not sure how much good OS-level RAID on a single device will do
> for you. Linux will try to reset the interface to the drive on I/O
> errors, will hang for long periods waiting for reads, etc and I wouldn't
> be at all surpri
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 03:36:15PM +0100, Kokas Zsolt wrote:
> > I've got (second-hand) recommendations of
> > YAFFS, and have heard good things about JFFS2 as well.
>
> What I see from them is that they supported wear-leveling before
> wear-leveling was included into the drives.
Or for smaller,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 12:03:11PM +0100, Kokas Zsolt wrote:
> The businees's side wants to make it as secure as it is possible,
> meaning, that the CF card will have two partitions, and the DB should
> be mirrored or distributed somehow on this two partiton, in case of a
> one-point disk-error the
Kokas Zsolt wrote:
>> I've got (second-hand) recommendations of
>> YAFFS, and have heard good things about JFFS2 as well.
>
> What I see from them is that they supported wear-leveling before
> wear-leveling was included into the drives.
AFAIK jffs2 and yaffs are really for simple (generally memor
> partitions. The OS should be able to deal with disk issues much more
> robustly than PG. If you were more or less worried about things I
As I see it now, it will be really the Soft-RAID what will suit for
everybody here (including me) as well.
> I'm not sure if you're trying to solve the wron
Hi,
on a linux system try software raid1 for pg data. check if pg is the
right choice for your needs here. maybe flat files for config+log is
less problematic.
regards
thomas
Kokas Zsolt schrieb:
Hi!
I'd need some advice.
I'm working on a quite special field, I have to set up an embedded D
