Re: [GENERAL] WAL receive process dies

2014-09-01 Thread Patrick Krecker
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Chris Hundt wrote: > (One of Patrick's coworkers here; thanks a lot for your assistance) > > Just in case you wanted this as well, I ran > > psql 'replication=1 dbname=XXX host=127.0.0.1 port=5432 user=XXX > password=XXX' -c 'IDENTIFY_SYSTEM;' > > (5432 is the stu

Re: [GENERAL] WAL receive process dies

2014-08-30 Thread Chris Hundt
(One of Patrick's coworkers here; thanks a lot for your assistance) Just in case you wanted this as well, I ran psql 'replication=1 dbname=XXX host=127.0.0.1 port=5432 user=XXX password=XXX' -c 'IDENTIFY_SYSTEM;' (5432 is the stuck replica and 5445 is the pipe to the working replica) syst

Re: [GENERAL] WAL receive process dies

2014-08-29 Thread Patrick Krecker
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > [FWIW: proper quoting makes answering easier and thus more likely] > > On 2014-08-29 15:37:51 -0700, Patrick Krecker wrote: > > I ran the following on the local endpoint of spiped: > > > > while [ true ]; do psql -h localhost -p 5445 judicat

Re: [GENERAL] WAL receive process dies

2014-08-29 Thread Andres Freund
[FWIW: proper quoting makes answering easier and thus more likely] On 2014-08-29 15:37:51 -0700, Patrick Krecker wrote: > I ran the following on the local endpoint of spiped: > > while [ true ]; do psql -h localhost -p 5445 judicata -U marbury -c "select > modtime, pg_last_xlog_receive_location()

Re: [GENERAL] WAL receive process dies

2014-08-29 Thread Patrick Krecker
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-08-29 13:04:43 -0700, Patrick Krecker wrote: > > Hi Craig -- Sorry for the late response, I've been tied up with some > other > > things for the last day. Just to give some context, this is a machine > that > > sits in our office and

Re: [GENERAL] WAL receive process dies

2014-08-29 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-08-29 13:04:43 -0700, Patrick Krecker wrote: > Hi Craig -- Sorry for the late response, I've been tied up with some other > things for the last day. Just to give some context, this is a machine that > sits in our office and replicates from another read slave in production via > a tunnel set

Re: [GENERAL] WAL receive process dies

2014-08-29 Thread Patrick Krecker
Hi Craig -- Sorry for the late response, I've been tied up with some other things for the last day. Just to give some context, this is a machine that sits in our office and replicates from another read slave in production via a tunnel set up with spiped. The spiped tunnel is working and postgres is

Re: [GENERAL] WAL receive process dies

2014-08-27 Thread Craig Ringer
On 08/28/2014 09:39 AM, Patrick Krecker wrote: > We have a periodic network connectivity issue (unrelated to Postgres) > that is causing the replication to fail. > > We are running Postgres 9.3 using streaming replication. We also have > WAL archives available to be replayed with restore_command.