Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem

2013-05-18 Thread S H
connection open takes time. I can almost 100% reduce it when my database size is 30 MB only with 1.5 bloating. > Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:54:04 -0600 > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem > From: scott.marl...@gmail.com > To: msq...@live.com > CC: pgsql-general@postgresql.org >

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem

2013-05-14 Thread Scott Marlowe
Not saying you HAVE bloating there, saying you MIGHT. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem

2013-05-14 Thread S H
I am doing regular insertion/deletion on the same tables .. and running vacuum in an hour... I suspect there is bloating in my tables.. but how does bloating in pgcatalog is happening is not clear...> Normally vacuum full is NOT required on a regular basis. However, if > you did something like

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem

2013-05-14 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:27 AM, S H wrote: >> I wonder if you've got a bloated pg catalog then. Certainly sounds >> like it's a possibility. >> So other than vacuuming when you recreate this, is the server working >> hard? What is vacuum vacuuming when this happens (pg_stat_activity >> should sho

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem

2013-05-14 Thread S H
> I wonder if you've got a bloated pg catalog then. Certainly sounds > like it's a possibility. > So other than vacuuming when you recreate this, is the server working > hard? What is vacuum vacuuming when this happens (pg_stat_activity > should show that) Does vacuum full is required to avoid bloa

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem

2013-05-13 Thread John R Pierce
On 5/13/2013 7:10 PM, S H wrote: My disk is utilized by many other components, thus do we have minimum recommendation my postgres to have sufficient speed. Current perfomance of my disk is around 1-5MB/sec. Is it sufficient? how are you measuring this? thats painfully slow by today's standa

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem

2013-05-13 Thread S H
My disk is utilized by many other components, thus do we have minimum recommendation my postgres to have sufficient speed. Current perfomance of my disk is around 1-5MB/sec. Is it sufficient? Is it slow and can be cause of slow vacuuming..

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem

2013-05-13 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:37 AM, S H wrote: >> What is the db server doing when this happens? What does top, vmstat, >> iostat etc have to say about it? > > It is high end server with 96 GB of RAM , 16 core server, but there are many > other application running, This db is used for monitoring the

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem

2013-05-13 Thread S H
since it's out of support. > I am migrating to new version, for new customers , but for old existing customer, it would require significant time. Is there any workaround for the same. Like improving some DB parameters. > Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 08:25:30 -0600 > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] V

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem

2013-05-13 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:05 AM, S H wrote: > Hi, > > I have my database in which i am executing vacuuming running manually in one > hour. vacuum or vacuum full? > In my production database sometime when vacuuming is running it is taking > long time in opening connection. What is the db server

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem

2007-08-17 Thread Tom Lane
Kari Lavikka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, database wide vacuum prevents user_online vacuum from deleting > old row versions and the table gets incredibly bloated. Update to 8.2. There was a fix put in for this specific issue. regards, tom lane

Re: [GENERAL] vacuum problem?

2004-12-10 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 06:35:39PM -0700, Ed L. wrote: > On Tuesday December 7 2004 6:27, Ed L. wrote: > > On Tuesday December 7 2004 5:58, marcelo Cortez wrote: > La traducción de Babelfish de mi mensaje anterior era hilarante, e indica > que mi español es lejos peor que pensamiento de I. Tends

Re: [GENERAL] vacuum problem?

2004-12-10 Thread Ed L.
On Tuesday December 7 2004 6:27, Ed L. wrote: > On Tuesday December 7 2004 5:58, marcelo Cortez wrote: > > > > /psql someDatabase > > > > vaccum full verbose; > > > > but nothing informs. > > > > in which cases vacuum do not inform anything? > > > > postgresql 7.4 on red hat 9.0 > > > > any clue

Re: [GENERAL] vacuum problem?

2004-12-10 Thread Ed L.
On Tuesday December 7 2004 5:58, marcelo Cortez wrote: > > > > > /psql someDatabase > > > vaccum full verbose; > > > but nothing informs. > > > in which cases vacuum do not inform anything? > > > postgresql 7.4 on red hat 9.0 > > > any clue be appreciate. > > > best regards > > > > Is your server

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum problem on large table

2001-06-05 Thread Tom Lane
mordicus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > vacuum verbose analyse record_blob; > NOTICE: --Relation record_blob-- > NOTICE: Pages 62437: Changed 0, reaped 0, Empty 0, New 0; Tup 1005540: Vac > 0, Keep/VTL 0/0, Crash 0, UnUsed 0, MinLen 80, MaxLen 2032; Re-using: > Free/Avail. Space 0/0; EndEmpty/A