On Feb 20, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Douglas McNaught wrote:
Alternatively, is there a better way to streamline the duplication
of a
database?
How about:
CREATE DATABASE newdb TEMPLATE olddb;
The template DB has to have no open connections during the entire copy
process, so it is not always
On Feb 20, 8:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Douglas McNaught") wrote:
> On 2/20/08, Kynn Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Alternatively, is there a better way to streamline the duplication of a
> > database?
>
> How about:
>
> CREATE DATABASE newdb TEMPLATE olddb;
>
Do these methods also recreat
"Kynn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As far as the shell is concerned, this pipeline fails, due to three errors
> emitted by pg_restore. All these errors are vacuous, as far as I can tell.
They're hardly vacuous --- they're telling you that the destination
database will be missing plpgsql,
On 2/20/08, Kynn Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alternatively, is there a better way to streamline the duplication of a
> database?
How about:
CREATE DATABASE newdb TEMPLATE olddb;
(don't remember the exact syntax, but it'll be in the docs for CREATE
DATABASE). I think the 'createdb' progr
