On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Robert Treat wrote:
On Friday 10 November 2006 14:41, Jeff Davis wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 20:39 +0300, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
Use @>, <@ operations instead of @ and ~
Look for discussions in -hackers for reasons of changing names
Ah, many thanks. How about updating tho
On Friday 10 November 2006 14:41, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 20:39 +0300, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> > >> Use @>, <@ operations instead of @ and ~
> > >> Look for discussions in -hackers for reasons of changing names
> > >
> > > Ah, many thanks. How about updating those web pages? :)
> >
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 20:39 +0300, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >> Use @>, <@ operations instead of @ and ~
> >> Look for discussions in -hackers for reasons of changing names
> >
> > Ah, many thanks. How about updating those web pages? :)
> Now they are in core:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs
Use @>, <@ operations instead of @ and ~
Look for discussions in -hackers for reasons of changing names
Ah, many thanks. How about updating those web pages? :)
Now they are in core:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/functions-array.html
Pls, why don't you use tsearch2 with GIN
On Nov 10, 2006, at 16:16 , Teodor Sigaev wrote:
Alexander Staubo wrote:
Two questions about GIN on 8.2. There's not much documentation
about GIN, but this should be possible:
create table foo (values text[]);
create index foo_values_index on foo using gin (text);
However, this then fai
Alexander Staubo wrote:
Two questions about GIN on 8.2. There's not much documentation about
GIN, but this should be possible:
create table foo (values text[]);
create index foo_values_index on foo using gin (text);
However, this then fails saying the operator "@" does not exist:
sele
