On 5 Aug 2009, at 19:27, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Csaba Nagy wrote:
Hi Andor,
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:15 +0200, Schindler Andor wrote:
Can anyone tell me, how this is possible? If we insert 12 on the
end, then
it decreases, but 11 remains the same. The problem on
On Wednesday 5. August 2009, Sam Mason wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:27:52AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> Otherwise we're blind men describing an elephant.
>
>Interesting analogy, not heard that one before!
http://www.noogenesis.com/pineapple/blind_men_elephant.html
--
Leif Biberg Kristens
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:27:52AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:15 +0200, Schindler Andor wrote:
> >> Can anyone tell me, how this is possible? If we insert 12 on the end, then
> >> it decreases, but 11 remains the same
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> Hi Andor,
>
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:15 +0200, Schindler Andor wrote:
>> Can anyone tell me, how this is possible? If we insert 12 on the end, then
>> it decreases, but 11 remains the same. The problem only occurs, when the
>> where condition co
Hi Andor,
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:15 +0200, Schindler Andor wrote:
> Can anyone tell me, how this is possible? If we insert 12 on the end, then
> it decreases, but 11 remains the same. The problem only occurs, when the
> where condition contains "sorrend > 9" or less.
I bet the "sorrend" column
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Schindler
Andor wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've got this update query:
>
> http://pastebin.com/m2e29990
>
> Can anyone tell me, how this is possible? If we insert 12 on the end, then
> it decreases, but 11 remains the same. The problem only occurs, when the
> where condition c
