"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Albe Laurenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
Would it be an option to have a checksum somewhere in each
data block that is verified upon read?
>
>>> That's been proposed before and rejected before. See the archives ...
>
>> I sea
"Albe Laurenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Would it be an option to have a checksum somewhere in each
>>> data block that is verified upon read?
>> That's been proposed before and rejected before. See the archives ...
> I searched for "checksum" and couldn't find it. Could
Tom Lane wrote:
>> Would it be an option to have a checksum somewhere in each
>> data block that is verified upon read?
>
> That's been proposed before and rejected before. See the archives ...
I searched for "checksum" and couldn't find it. Could someone
give me a pointer? I'm not talking about
"Albe Laurenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would it be an option to have a checksum somewhere in each
> data block that is verified upon read?
That's been proposed before and rejected before. See the archives ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of bro
Tom Lane wrote:
>> - Shouldn't there be an error, some kind of 'missing magic
>> number' or similar, when a table file consists of only
>> zeros?
>
> The particular case of an all-zeroes page is specifically allowed,
> and has to be because it's a valid transient state in various
> scenarios.
"Albe Laurenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Shouldn't there be an error, some kind of 'missing magic
> number' or similar, when a table file consists of only
> zeros?
The particular case of an all-zeroes page is specifically allowed,
and has to be because it's a valid transient state in var
