On 12/21/2016 06:53 PM, n...@olansoft.com wrote:
22.12.2016, 06:31, "Adrian Klaver" :
Alright looks like it doing the correct thing.
Now if I am following you say you see the issue starting with 9.5+. As
it so happens that is when checkpoint_segments was replaced with
max_wal_size:
If yo
22.12.2016, 06:31, "Adrian Klaver" :
>
> Alright looks like it doing the correct thing.
>
> Now if I am following you say you see the issue starting with 9.5+. As
> it so happens that is when checkpoint_segments was replaced with
> max_wal_size:
Yes, in 9.4 recovery process began instantly(or near
On 12/21/2016 04:16 PM, n...@olansoft.com wrote:
22.12.2016, 04:21, "Adrian Klaver" :
On 12/21/2016 02:17 PM, n...@olansoft.com wrote:
Hi.
Perhaps i've sent it to wrong mail-list previously.
After the upgrade postgresql had a strange behavior. After the crash, server launch now
take a l
22.12.2016, 04:21, "Adrian Klaver" :
> On 12/21/2016 02:17 PM, n...@olansoft.com wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Perhaps i've sent it to wrong mail-list previously.
>>
>> After the upgrade postgresql had a strange behavior. After the crash,
>> server launch now take a long time, up to 30-40 minutes somet
On 12/21/2016 02:17 PM, n...@olansoft.com wrote:
Hi.
Perhaps i've sent it to wrong mail-list previously.
After the upgrade postgresql had a strange behavior. After the crash, server launch now
take a long time, up to 30-40 minutes sometimes. When connecting to the server (as well
as in the lo
