Re: [GENERAL] TSearch vs. Homebrew

2006-06-27 Thread Tim Allen
Oleg Bartunov wrote: On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Hannes Dorbath wrote: http://www.symfony-project.com/askeet/21 How does this dead simple approach compare to TSearch performance / scaling wise? Sorry, I was a bit off-topic. Lucene scales as any inverted index based engine. In 8.2 tsearch2 also has

Re: [GENERAL] TSearch vs. Homebrew

2006-06-27 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Hannes Dorbath wrote: On 27.06.2006 13:31, Oleg Bartunov wrote: On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Hannes Dorbath wrote: http://www.symfony-project.com/askeet/21 How does this dead simple approach compare to TSearch performance / scaling wise? You miss the main point in tsearch2 -

Re: [GENERAL] TSearch vs. Homebrew

2006-06-27 Thread Hannes Dorbath
On 27.06.2006 13:31, Oleg Bartunov wrote: On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Hannes Dorbath wrote: http://www.symfony-project.com/askeet/21 How does this dead simple approach compare to TSearch performance / scaling wise? You miss the main point in tsearch2 - full integration with database, i.e., full ac

Re: [GENERAL] TSearch vs. Homebrew

2006-06-27 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Hannes Dorbath wrote: http://www.symfony-project.com/askeet/21 How does this dead simple approach compare to TSearch performance / scaling wise? You miss the main point in tsearch2 - full integration with database, i.e., full access to metadata, ACID. Lucene has no