On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 1/27/15 1:51 AM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
>>
>> I have a relatively small database with not many writes. However, I'm
>> keen to ensure that those writes I receive are not lost. Archiving gets
>> me most of the way there, but it is asynchronous. I
On 1/27/15 1:51 AM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
I have a relatively small database with not many writes. However, I'm
keen to ensure that those writes I receive are not lost. Archiving gets
me most of the way there, but it is asynchronous. Is there any way to
archive individual WAL records without runni
