Re: [GENERAL] Solaris Postgres

2009-09-26 Thread Zdenek Kotala
John R Pierce píše v so 26. 09. 2009 v 10:57 -0700: > Zdenek Kotala wrote: > >> I asked because we're working on an inhouse app using postgres, the team > >> wants to use 8.4... I had previously packaged 8.3.7 in solaris package > >> format only to have it come out as a patch a month or two la

Re: [GENERAL] Solaris Postgres

2009-09-26 Thread John R Pierce
Zdenek Kotala wrote: I asked because we're working on an inhouse app using postgres, the team wants to use 8.4... I had previously packaged 8.3.7 in solaris package format only to have it come out as a patch a month or two later, so I was hoping to save myself the redundant effort. You

Re: [GENERAL] Solaris Postgres

2009-09-26 Thread Zdenek Kotala
John R Pierce píše v so 26. 09. 2009 v 09:44 -0700: > >> I'm curious if anyone has a clue how long before Sun releases PG 8.4.x > >> in Solaris 'patch' format ... > >> > > > > Currently S10 is shipped with three version (8.1, 8.2, 8.3) of > > PostgreSQL. There is no plan to integrate PG8.4

Re: [GENERAL] Solaris Postgres

2009-09-26 Thread Zdenek Kotala
John R Pierce píše v út 15. 09. 2009 v 19:53 -0700: > anyone on the PG team privvy to Sun Solaris patches for postgres? like > patch 138826-04 is Postgres 8.3.7 for Solaris10 Sparc... 138827-04 is > the same for Sol10 x86... What is wrong on this? It is standard Solaris way how to deliver

Re: [GENERAL] Solaris Postgres

2009-09-26 Thread John R Pierce
Zdenek Kotala wrote: John R Pierce píše v út 15. 09. 2009 v 19:53 -0700: anyone on the PG team privvy to Sun Solaris patches for postgres? like patch 138826-04 is Postgres 8.3.7 for Solaris10 Sparc... 138827-04 is the same for Sol10 x86... What is wrong on this? It is standard S