True. In our environment we have other layers to deal with network security
which covers us for encryption of a data as it's transmitted, and you
definitely should do that, but that's not something a DBA would normally be
concerned with.
And given that he said that the machine may be standalone, I
On 12/28/2016 4:16 PM, jesusthefrog wrote:
If you're storing HIPAA data and/or PII then just make sure it's
encrypted at rest. We just did this at my workplace by using full disk
encryption on the disk which stores the DB files.
That may not be the best solution, but it appears to work well e
If you're storing HIPAA data and/or PII then just make sure it's encrypted
at rest. We just did this at my workplace by using full disk encryption on
the disk which stores the DB files.
That may not be the best solution, but it appears to work well enough.
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Ver
On 12/27/2016 11:59 AM, Chris Weekes wrote:
Hello Sir or Madam:
I wanted to install PostgreSQL v 9.6 on a machine that may
stand alone and or be part of a network sharing hospital
data.
I was wondering what steps if any need to be taken to ensure
that the patient and operational data is secure
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Rich Shepard
wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2016, Chris Weekes wrote:
>
> I was wondering what steps if any need to be taken to ensure that the
>> patient and operational data is secure on a machine and or across the
>> network.
>>
>
> Chris,
>
> I'm far from an exper
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016, Chris Weekes wrote:
I was wondering what steps if any need to be taken to ensure that the
patient and operational data is secure on a machine and or across the
network.
Chris,
I'm far from an expert but until more knowledgeable folks respond I'll
offer a couple of quick
