On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Scott Marlowe
wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Digit Penguin
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > we use PostgreSql 9.x in conjunction with BIND/DNS for some Companies
> with
> > about 1.000 queries per second.
> > Now we have to scale the system up to 100.00
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Digit Penguin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> we use PostgreSql 9.x in conjunction with BIND/DNS for some Companies with
> about 1.000 queries per second.
> Now we have to scale the system up to 100.000 queries per second (about).
>
> Bind/DNS is very light and i think can n
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Digit Penguin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> we use PostgreSql 9.x in conjunction with BIND/DNS for some Companies with
> about 1.000 queries per second.
> Now we have to scale the system up to 100.000 queries per second (about).
>
> Bind/DNS is very light and i think can