On Dec 19, 7:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Helmle) wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2006 08:37:01 -0800, "BigSmoke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What would solve my problem is if there was a
> > method to, at the end of a begin/end block,
> > rollback the changes made in that block
> > without having to ra
On 19 Dec 2006 08:37:01 -0800, "BigSmoke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
What would solve my problem is if there was a
> method to, at the end of
>> a begin/end block, I could rollback the changes made in that block
>> without having to raise an exception. Is it somehow possible to
>> explici
On Dec 19, 5:32 pm, "BigSmoke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 5:00 pm, "BigSmoke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 19, 4:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Helmle) wrote:
>
> > > On 19 Dec 2006 07:05:10 -0800, "BigSmoke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I understand that due to
On Dec 19, 5:00 pm, "BigSmoke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 4:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Helmle) wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 19 Dec 2006 07:05:10 -0800, "BigSmoke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I understand that due to a lack of nested transaction support, it is
> > > not possible to u
On Dec 19, 4:16 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Helmle) wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2006 07:05:10 -0800, "BigSmoke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I understand that due to a lack of nested transaction support, it is
> > not possible to use START TRANSACTION within a PL/PgSQL function. What
> > I, however, do
On 19 Dec 2006 07:05:10 -0800, "BigSmoke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that due to a lack of nested transaction support, it is
> not possible to use START TRANSACTION within a PL/PgSQL function. What
> I, however, do not understand is why I can't use SAVEPOINT either. I'm
> writing
