Re: [GENERAL] STDERR vs. SYSLOG logging

2007-05-02 Thread Andrej Ricnik-Bay
On 5/2/07, David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I prefer syslog because those logs are better suited for processing by pgfouine and tools like it :) I prefer syslog-ng because I can send the logs of to a central log-host using tcp ... :) Cheers, Andrej ---(end of br

Re: [GENERAL] STDERR vs. SYSLOG logging

2007-05-01 Thread David Fetter
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:12:41AM -0600, Kevin Kempter wrote: > Hi List; > > Anyone have any thoughts per which logging method (SYSLOG vs STDERR) > is the better approach ? > > Thanks in advance... I prefer syslog because those logs are better suited for processing by pgfouine and tools like it

Re: [GENERAL] STDERR vs. SYSLOG logging

2007-05-01 Thread Jeff Davis
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 09:12 -0600, Kevin Kempter wrote: > Hi List; > > Anyone have any thoughts per which logging method (SYSLOG vs STDERR) is the > better approach ? > One isn't better or worse than the other. Where are you able to see the logs more easily? STDERR can be redirected to log file