-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Actually that same letter is available at sco's website. The one at SCO only
has a list with all the "infringing" header files attached.
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 10:30 pm, Alex Satrapa wrote:
> Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> > Feel free to link away :)
Gavin M. Roy wrote:
Feel free to link away :)
Gavin
Adam Ruth wrote:
...Also, if you prefer, I can mirror it on
my server and post that link so as to not chew up your bandwidth.
Just make sure you get someone to mirror it before it hits Slashdot.
That way it's someone else's server that gets tu
Feel free to link away :)
Gavin
Adam Ruth wrote:
I've mentioned your predicament to the Yahoo SCO message board, and
some have asked to see the letter. Would you mind if I showed it (I
won't if you'd prefer I don't) Also, if you prefer, I can mirror it on
my server and post that link so as t
I've mentioned your predicament to the Yahoo SCO message board, and
some have asked to see the letter. Would you mind if I showed it (I
won't if you'd prefer I don't) Also, if you prefer, I can mirror it on
my server and post that link so as to not chew up your bandwidth.
Also, the same reques
Excellent response!
On Jan 21, 2004, at 3:50 PM, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
Here is a copy of the letter which I've sent out today:
http://www.gavinroy.com/~gavinr/SCO%20Response.pdf
We'll see their response and act accordingly. Thanks for all the
feedback everyone.
Gavin
Alex Satrapa wrote:
Gavi
Here is a copy of the letter which I've sent out today:
http://www.gavinroy.com/~gavinr/SCO%20Response.pdf
We'll see their response and act accordingly. Thanks for all the
feedback everyone.
Gavin
Alex Satrapa wrote:
Gavin M. Roy wrote:
My problem is the threat from SCO is not from the blea
Oh, I like that added touch :)
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >you should invite him in to talk, and let him know that you are
> >investigating drop'ng Linux altogether and are curious as to what
> >SCO/UnixServer could offer ... basically, tell him y
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
you should invite him in to talk, and let him know that you are
investigating drop'ng Linux altogether and are curious as to what
SCO/UnixServer could offer ... basically, tell him you are looking at
options, and take up his time on 'the sales pitch' :)
But before
you should invite him in to talk, and let him know that you are
investigating drop'ng Linux altogether and are curious as to what
SCO/UnixServer could offer ... basically, tell him you are looking at
options, and take up his time on 'the sales pitch' :)
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
>
Moreover, what should prevent the SCO scumbags from molesting *BSD
users if they would succeed in destroying Linux?
There might be technical reasons to move from Linux to *BSD, but the
SCO amok run should not be a reason to do so.
I agree with this. SCO has really done nothing but prove that Li
Jim Mercer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 06:16:46PM -0800, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
Thanks for the feedback thus far. I should also mention I use freebsd
for other stuff, but I am mainly asking in peoples experience, which is
the best for PostgreSQL to live on specifically. In terms of a nice smp
On 21/01/2004 04:21 Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Stephen Robert Norris wrote:
> Of course SCO is planning to sue the BSD users, too, so it's not really
> a solution.
We figure that SCO will either be bought out, or go bankrupt, before we
have to worry about them :)
If they tried th
Thanks for the feedback thus far. I should also mention I use freebsd
> for other stuff, but I am mainly asking in peoples experience, which is
> the best for PostgreSQL to live on specifically. In terms of a nice smp
> high end scsi system. Sorry for the lack of specifics on that before.
Fa
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 06:16:46PM -0800, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback thus far. I should also mention I use freebsd
> for other stuff, but I am mainly asking in peoples experience, which is
> the best for PostgreSQL to live on specifically. In terms of a nice smp
> high end s
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback thus far. I should also mention I use freebsd
> for other stuff, but I am mainly asking in peoples experience, which is
> the best for PostgreSQL to live on specifically. In terms of a nice smp
> high end scsi system. Sorry for
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Stephen Robert Norris wrote:
> Of course SCO is planning to sue the BSD users, too, so it's not really
> a solution.
We figure that SCO will either be bought out, or go bankrupt, before we
have to worry about them :)
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Service
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 11:55, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
>
> > I'm currently one of the targets of SCO's linux licensing extortion
> > business plan, and am contemplating switching to one of the BSD's to
> > avoid any potential problems. I'm curious which B
Thanks for the feedback thus far. I should also mention I use freebsd
for other stuff, but I am mainly asking in peoples experience, which is
the best for PostgreSQL to live on specifically. In terms of a nice smp
high end scsi system. Sorry for the lack of specifics on that before.
Gavin
M
--On Tuesday, January 20, 2004 14:06:35 -0800 "Gavin M. Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm currently one of the targets of SCO's linux licensing extortion
business plan, and am contemplating switching to one of the BSD's to
avoid any potential problems. I'm curious which BSD people prefer fo
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> I'm currently one of the targets of SCO's linux licensing extortion
> business plan, and am contemplating switching to one of the BSD's to
> avoid any potential problems. I'm curious which BSD people prefer for
> large scale databases and why. Any poin
20 matches
Mail list logo
