Re: [GENERAL] SAVEPOINT and FOR UPDATE

On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 18:01, Gregory Stark wrote: > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Thomas F. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I sort of expected the release of the savepoint to be tantamount to a > > > commit of the subtransaction, but it doesn't appear to have been. > >

Re: [GENERAL] SAVEPOINT and FOR UPDATE

Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Thomas F. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I sort of expected the release of the savepoint to be tantamount to a > > commit of the subtransaction, but it doesn't appear to have been. > > But you still haven't committed the outer transaction: rol

Re: [GENERAL] SAVEPOINT and FOR UPDATE

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 12:43 -0500, Thomas F. O'Connell wrote: > I'm curious to know more about the postgres implementation of > subtransactions via SAVEPOINT. > Locks are held until the end of the outer transaction, see: in the first par

Re: [GENERAL] SAVEPOINT and FOR UPDATE

"Thomas F. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I sort of expected the release of the savepoint to be tantamount to a > commit of the subtransaction, but it doesn't appear to have been. But you still haven't committed the outer transaction: rolling it back must undo the effects of the subtra