On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
> > (Seems like you forgot to push the Reply-all button)
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Madovsky wrote:
> >> On 10/3/2015 3:30 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >>> and no reason
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> (Seems like you forgot to push the Reply-all button)
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Madovsky wrote:
>> On 10/3/2015 3:30 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> and no reason is given to justify *why* this would be needed in your case
>> reaso
On 10/4/2015 3:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
(Seems like you forgot to push the Reply-all button)
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Madovsky wrote:
On 10/3/2015 3:30 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
and no reason is given to justify *why* this would be needed in your case
reason for a choice can
(Seems like you forgot to push the Reply-all button)
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Madovsky wrote:
> On 10/3/2015 3:30 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> and no reason is given to justify *why* this would be needed in your case
> reason for a choice can be often an issue for other :D
>
> I thought t
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Madovsky wrote:
> On 10/3/2015 6:55 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Madovsky wrote:
>> Requesting the master would be necessary, still I don't really get why
>> you don't want to query the master for read queries... You could for
>> exa
On 10/3/2015 6:55 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Madovsky wrote:
On 10/3/2015 4:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Madovsky wrote:
I would like to fix a issue I'm facing of with the version 9.4 streaming
replication.
is it possible t
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Madovsky wrote:
>
>
> On 10/3/2015 4:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Madovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to fix a issue I'm facing of with the version 9.4 streaming
>>> replication.
>>> is it possible to set on the fly the sync
On 10/3/2015 4:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Madovsky wrote:
I would like to fix a issue I'm facing of with the version 9.4 streaming
replication.
is it possible to set on the fly the synchronous commit on the master (or
standby?)
which only sync commit the hot
Hi
On 10/3/2015 5:46 AM, Edson Richter wrote:
Madovsky escreveu
> Hi,
>
> I would like to fix a issue I'm facing of with the version 9.4
streaming
> replication.
> is it possible to set on the fly the synchronous commit on the master
> (or standby?)
> which only sync commit the ho
Madovsky escreveu
> Hi,
>
> I would like to fix a issue I'm facing of with the version 9.4 streaming
> replication.
> is it possible to set on the fly the synchronous commit on the master
> (or standby?)
> which only sync commit the hot standby node used by the client who has a
> r
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Madovsky wrote:
> I would like to fix a issue I'm facing of with the version 9.4 streaming
> replication.
> is it possible to set on the fly the synchronous commit on the master (or
> standby?)
> which only sync commit the hot standby node used by the client who has
11 matches
Mail list logo
