On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 07:34 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:11:43PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 09:01 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > > > Are there any rules of thumb to consider for making an application
> > > > easier to work with a "general" repli
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:11:43PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 09:01 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > > Are there any rules of thumb to consider for making an application
> > > easier to work with a "general" replication solution?
> > >
> > > The applications I mostly deal wit
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:11:43 +0800
Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 09:01 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > > Are there any rules of thumb to consider for making an
> > > application easier to work with a "general" replication
> > > solution?
> > >
> > > The applications I mostly deal wi
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 09:01 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > Are there any rules of thumb to consider for making an application
> > easier to work with a "general" replication solution?
> >
> > The applications I mostly deal with are e-commerce sites.
>
> It really depends on what replication solut
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:05:08PM +0200, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> I'm starting to see the need of a replication solution in my
> horizon.
>
> I've learned that some replication solution require code
> modification, some require different assumption abut how connections
> behave...
>
> Are
