Jan Wieck wrote:
> > I think the real answer is that until recently, ERserver wasn't open
> > source and we didn't have the option to include it. Now that it is
> > open source, we could think about it. Having looked at the code, I
> > think it's definitely not ready for prime time, but it could
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
It is not that we don't want to include replication in the base
project it is that ERserver does not meet the requirements of what can
be included in the base project. Specifically (I believe) the
requirement of Jav
